Three decades of rate rises
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
30 years of council tax
30 years on from the introduction of council tax, our latest research has revealed ([link removed]) just how dramatically this burden on households has grown. Since 1993/94, the first year it was levied, the average Band D council tax bill across England has increased by a shocking 79 per cent in real terms!
When it was first introduced, the average Band D bill was ÂŁ568 but this has now rocketed to ÂŁ2,065. Huntingdonshire topped the table having hiked rates by an eye-watering 149 per cent in real terms. South Cambridgeshire, who regular readers will recall are currently conducting a reckless experiment with a four-day week ([link removed]) , came second with a rise of 142 per cent. By comparison, Wandsworth has increased their council tax by just 1 per cent in real terms, the lowest of any local authority. Since 1993, there have been 9,462 individual tax rises compared to 404 freezes and just 363 cuts.
Our findings dominated national and local media ([link removed]) , featuring on the front page of the Daily Telegraph and Yorkshire Post, and with write-ups in the Mail ([link removed]) , Sun ([link removed]) , and Times ([link removed]) to name just a few. Responding to the findings, our chief executive, John OâConnell, didnât mince his words: âHouseholds in every corner of the country are being hammered by higher rates year after year. Three decades since its introduction, the relentless climb of council tax shows no sign of reaching its peak.â
With Brits already pushed to the limit, itâs more important than ever that local authorities crack down on wasteful spending ([link removed]) and drop pointless pet projects that see taxpayersâ cash squandered!
Tens of thousands of you have already signed our petition ([link removed]) to stop council tax rises, but we need you to keep sharing the petition amongst your friends and family ([link removed]) . The more people who stand with us, the more chance we have of stopping these punishing local levies rising even further.
Itâs only through the generosity of our supporters, people like you, that we can keep campaigning and producing this kind of agenda-setting research. Will you back us today by clicking here to donate? ([link removed])
Grassroots news
The latest leg of our Town Hall Rich List ([link removed]) Roadshow saw our team in Sheffield, where just seven members of staff cost local taxpayers over ÂŁ1.15 million! When we asked residents whether they felt these princely pay packets were justified, their answer was a pretty resounding âNo!â
Continuing our tour of the country in a couple of weeks, weâll be heading to Kidderminster where the corporate director: economic prosperity and place received an astounding ÂŁ286,230 in 2021/22. Let me know if youâd like to come along and meet the team. (mailto:
[email protected]?subject=Kidderminster%20action%20day)
TaxPayers' Alliance in the news
Shady deal for asylum ships
Weâve long warned ([link removed]) about the importance of transparency when awarding government contracts and the need for a competitive tendering process, but sadly the message doesnât seem to be sinking in. This week it emerged that ministers have signed a ÂŁ1.6 billion deal ([link removed]) covering the UKâs asylum accommodation ships, without any competition.
John was quick to question the shady deal ([link removed]) when he spoke to the Independent: âThis murky contract leaves taxpayers in the dark. The migrant crisis may require an urgent response, but bungled procurement has cost a fortune in recent years.â Ministers and civil servants must do all they can to ensure contracts are awarded through a fair and open tendering process that secures value for money for taxpayers.
HMRCâs out for summer
Weâve probably all had to endure calling HMRC at one point or another. While it may not be something we relish, it is useful to be able to speak to someone when trying to navigate our absurdly complex tax system. Unfortunately, for anyone with a question about self-assessment, no one will be available this summer as HMRC plans to close their helpline until September ([link removed]) !
TPA researcher, Jonathan Eida, called out the latest cutback ([link removed]) from civil servants telling BBC News: âWorkers trying to do the right thing require assistance all year around, and for many people going online presents a number of challenges. HMRC should reverse this decision and pick up the phone this summer.â Hear hear!
Is paying more tax patriotic?
After the shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, described paying more tax as âpatrioticâ, John spoke with Colin Brazier on LBC to point out that it might be more patriotic for politicians to start cutting the tax burden ([link removed]) instead.
[link removed]
John rightly told LBC listeners across the country ([link removed]) : âItâs not particularly patriotic for politicians to continue to whack taxes up to record levels and just ask us to all sit back and meekly take it⊠If they stepped back and allowed us to keep more of our money, that might be a patriotic thing for them to do from a taxpayersâ perspective.â
Home working continues
18 months on since work from home guidance was dropped, it seems like civil servants still havenât got the memo. TPA staff were shocked to learn that during the last week of May, attendance at five government departments barely exceeded 30 per cent ([link removed]) !
Our media campaign manager, Conor Holohan, summed up the situation perfectly ([link removed]) , telling the Daily Mail: âTaxpayers resent paying for empty desks. The Government should sell off unused space or get workers back behind their desks.â Quite right!
Blog of the week
Taking away takeaways
In this weekâs blog, Joe Otten, Liberal Democrat councillor for Dore and Totley in Sheffield, takes aim at the public health blobâs latest bonkers scheme ([link removed]) . Local health chiefs at his council have proposed a ban on new street food vendors during the day within 800 metres of a secondary school.
Highlighting the absurdity of the proposed ban, Joe points out: âTobacco, alcohol, gambling and pornography, I think most would agree, are greater vices than chips and pizza, yet we donât ban them altogether within 800 metres of a secondary school for adults and children alike⊠If my childrenâs worst vice turns out to be a takeaway from the local chippy I will be happy.â
Click to read this blog from the front line in full ([link removed])
War on Waste
It seems like everytime a local politician decides to âinvestâ in a building, it ends up costing taxpayers money. This week, we bring you the case of Northamptonshireâs police and crime commissioner (PCC) who managed to spend over ÂŁ3 million ([link removed]) on a garage workshop to repair police vehicles which sat empty for more than two years and will now be sold for a loss.
After refit costs spiralled to an unbelievable ÂŁ16 million, the local PCC now expects to lose at least ÂŁ1 million on the sale. Officials must treat taxpayersâ money with the respect it deserves and put a stop to these unacceptable levels of waste!
Send me your examples of wasteful public sector spending (mailto:
[email protected]?subject=re.%20Weekly%20bulletin)
Benjamin Elks
Operations Manager
[link removed]
============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 The TaxPayers' Alliance, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to receiving our updates, or we have a legitimate interest to contact you about our work.
TaxPayers' Alliance is a trading name of The TaxPayers' Alliance Limited, a company incorporated in England & Wales under company registration no. 04873888 and whose registered office is at 55 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL.
You can read our privacy notice here: [link removed]
Our mailing address is:
The TaxPayers' Alliance
55 Tufton Street
London, London SW1P 3QL
United Kingdom
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.