How ‘work requirements’ spawned a lucrative industry.
View in browser ([link removed]) | Support our newsroom ([link removed])
[link removed]
** THE WEEKLY REVEAL
------------------------------------------------------------
Saturday, June 17, 2023
Hello! In this issue:
* We dig into the welfare-to-work industrial complex.
* A look at how crime coverage can affect victims.
* Abortion bans are confusing doctors on what's legal.
** THIS WEEK’S PODCAST
------------------------------------------------------------
** The Welfare-to-Work Industrial Complex
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
President Bill Clinton speaks about welfare reform at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tenn., in October 1996. Credit: Getty Images
Ever since so-called welfare reform in the 1990s, the system has been based on the idea that welfare recipients must be doing some kind of work or job-readiness activity to receive government assistance. It’s a system that plays on what Americans have long wanted to believe – that all it takes to move out of poverty is a can-do attitude and hard work.
Now, a growing chorus of politicians argue for more and tougher work requirements for people in need. Recently, Republicans successfully fought to create new work requirements for food assistance under the debt ceiling deal.
In this episode ([link removed]) , Krissy Clark from The Uncertain Hour takes listeners into America’s welfare-to-work system.
Reveal partnered with The Uncertain Hour podcast from Marketplace to explore the lucrative industry built on welfare-to-work policies. Critics say these for-profit welfare companies have cultivated their own cycle of dependency on the federal government.
Listen to the episode ([link removed])
🎧 Other places to listen: Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Google Podcasts ([link removed]) , Stitcher ([link removed]) or wherever you get your podcasts.
We're a nonprofit newsroom, and we can't do this work without you. Donate today ([link removed]) .
** HEADLINES
------------------------------------------------------------
** What’s Happening in the News – With a Reveal Context
------------------------------------------------------------
As Reveal reporter Rachel de Leon investigated cases of police criminally charging sexual assault victims they don’t find credible for “Victim/Suspect,” ([link removed]) she also discovered a second problem: media coverage splashing victims’ names and mugshots all over their community, parroting police statements that they lied about being raped.
In our film, now streaming on Netflix ([link removed]) , viewers meet Dyanie Bermeo, who talks about being booked and released, falling asleep in her dorm room and waking up to a police Facebook post about her arrest. The post said she lied about being assaulted and was charged with false reporting. Local media picked it up, and the criminal justice major’s life was forever changed.
Bermeo was acquitted the following year. De Leon found glaring holes in the police investigation, too. But the news stories saying she lied were still online – with no updates.
De Leon has been reaching out to media outlets that covered Bermeo’s arrest to tell them about our investigation and that Bermeo was acquitted. Now, two of those articles have been taken down. "I feel as though it’s a huge step towards my healing,” Bermeo told us.
Stories about an arrest, like Bermeo’s, would have likely lived forever on the internet, even if the person was quietly exonerated. That’s why many news outlets have in recent years created policies around requests to unpublish or take down a story. For journalists who want to learn more, there are resources: Unpublishing The News ([link removed]) has sample policies and resources for rethinking your crime coverage or deciding how to handle unpublishing requests from the public. The Reynolds Journalism Institute ([link removed]) and the News Leaders Association ([link removed]) have examined best practices for unpublishing requests.
As de Leon’s reporting continues, she’ll keep telling news organizations covering false reporting arrests about our work and what we learned about these poorly investigated cases. Already, in most of the top Google results for Bermeo, she’s telling her own story.
** A Quote to Remember
------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm not even supposed to discuss the option of going out of state, and to withhold that information, it feels unethical."
Dr. John Visintine works with patients with high-risk pregnancies in the Rio Grande Valley, on the Texas/Mexico border. He says ([link removed]) he can no longer counsel patients the same way, and it's got him thinking about leaving.
Listen: The Post-Roe Health Care Crisis ([link removed])
Read: ‘You Know What? I’m Not Doing This Anymore.’ (Slate) ([link removed])
Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe (Guttmacher Institute) ([link removed])
** In Case You Missed It
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
🎧The Long Campaign to Turn Birth Control Into the New Abortion ([link removed])
[link removed]
🎧 The Battle for Clean Energy in Coal Country ([link removed])
This issue of The Weekly Reveal was written by Kate Howard and edited by Nikki Frick. If you enjoyed this issue, forward it to a friend ([link removed]) . Have some thoughts? Drop us a line (mailto:
[email protected]) with feedback or ideas!
============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed] )
Copyright © 2023 The Center for Investigative Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for The Weekly Reveal newsletter.
Our mailing address is:
The Center for Investigative Reporting
PO Box 8307
Emeryville, CA 94662
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from all Reveal emails ([link removed])
.
