Military Leaks Target Biden Opponents!
[INSIDE JW]
BIDEN JUSTICE DEPT. DISCUSSED TRUMP’S VIDEO OF FBI RAID ON
MAR-A-LAGO
[[link removed]]
We continue to reveal the details of the Biden administration’s
unconscionable raid on President Trump’s Florida home.
We received 477 pages
[[link removed]]
of
records pages from the Department of Justice (DOJ) that show top
officials of the National Security Division discussing the political
implications of Trump allowing CNN to use closed-circuit TV (CCTV)
footage of the raid on his Mar-a-Lago home. The documents confirm
that the Justice Department had asked that Mar-a-Lago CCTV be turned
off before the raid.
We obtained the records in response to a September
2022 FOIA lawsuit
[[link removed]]
filed
after the Justice Department failed to respond to an August 2022
request for records about the August 8, 2022, Mar-a-Lago
raid ((_Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice
[[link removed])
(No. 1:22-cv-02884)).
In an August 17, 2022, email exchange
[[link removed]],
with the subject “CNN – Mar-a-Lago CCTV
Footage,” a trial attorney with the Justice
Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section of
the National Security Division, whose name is redacted, writes to
colleagues:
> I just received a call from our case agents at FBI, and apparently
> the Bureau has been given a heads-up by CNN that CNN has CCTV
> [closed circuit television] footage from Mar-a-Lago (presumably of
> agents executing the search) that they may air as soon as tonight
> [Redacted]
>
> I have no further info on what, specifically, CNN has. But
> [redacted].
Jay Bratt, chief of the Counterintelligence and Export Control
Section, comments
[[link removed]],
“CNN is saying FPOTUS [former president] is still weighing whether
to release the footage.”
Communications Advisor Luis Rossello adds
[[link removed]
> Got a call from Evan [likely then-Trump attorney Evan Corcoran]. As
> Jay says, Trump team is still weighing the release. Per Evan, some
> say it will energize base, others say not a good look for FPOTUS to
> have it out there.
>
> CNN is working on a story that Jay requested Trump team to turn off
> the cameras and they refused.
Justice Department official George Toscas replies
[[link removed]],
“We’re waiting to hear back from FBIHQ on their recommended
approach.”
Bratt writes
[[link removed]],
“We did. This was in the call [redacted] and I had with Evan
Corcoran before the search. It is standard for [redacted].”
Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Marshall Miller forwards
the exchange to a personal email account of Deputy Attorney General
Lisa Monaco.
Miller makes a comment that is entirely redacted, to which
a Justice Department National Security Division official, whose
name is redacted, responds
[[link removed]],
“Kelsey/Luis: Will we also plan to communicate to CNN the law
enforcement safety need to blur agent faces if footage ends up being
released?”
Anthony Coley, Director of the DOJ Public Affairs Office, replies
[[link removed]],
“Done.”
If the Biden regime’s unprecedented and abusive FBI raid on
Trump’s home was on the up and up, they would have been happy to
have it recorded on video.
We are in the forefront of the court battles for transparency
regarding Biden administration’s targeting of former President
Trump.
A separate Judicial Watch lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against the
National Archives and Records Administration resulted in
the release of 1,276 pages of records
[[link removed]]
about
the unprecedented document dispute between the Archives
and President Trump. Click here
[[link removed]]
or here
[[link removed]]
to review the records.
In August 2022, we sued to unseal
[[link removed]]
the
search warrant affidavit
[[link removed]]
used
to justify the unprecedented raid on the home of former President
Trump.
In September 2022, we filed
[[link removed]]
lawsuits
against the DOJ for its records and the FBI’s records about the
Mar-a-Lago raid search warrant application and approval, as well as
communications about the warrant between the FBI, Executive Office of
the President and the Secret Service.
In October 2022, we sued
[[link removed]]
the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) for all communications of the U.S. Secret
Service internally and with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
regarding the raid on Trump’s home and for any video or audio
recordings made during the raid.
In November 2022, we sued
[[link removed]]
the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) for all communications between the Secret
Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regarding the
search warrant that precipitated the raid on former Trump’s Florida
residence at Mar-a-Lago.
With the Biden regime’s arrest of Trump this week, the raid on his
home, and the long-running FBI/DOJ abuse of this man, Judicial Watch
has had its hands full exposing and opposing this massive government
corruption. With your support, not only we will push for the truth and
accountability, but Judicial Watch will increase its work to protect
the Republic.
JUDICIAL WATCH SUES AIR FORCE OVER RELEASE OF RECORDS OF REP. ANNA
LUNA
We filed a FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for
information on the improper release of the personnel records of U.S.
Rep Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) (_Judicial
Watch Inc. v U.S. Department of Defense
[[link removed]]
_(No.
1:23-cv-01590)). Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia after the Air Force failed
to comply with a March 7, 2023, FOIA request for:
* All personnel records of Anna Paulina Luna, also known as Anna
Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, including unmodified
original digital documents, released to any individual or entity from
January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023
* All records, including but not limited to communications, FOIA
requests, and SF-180requests, concerning or relating to the release of
personnel records of Anna Paulina Luna, also known as Anna Paulina
Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, to any individual or entity
from January 1, 2019 to March 6, 2023.
* All records of administrative or punitive action taken against any
individuals involved with the release of personnel records of Anna
Paulina Luna, also known as Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna
Paulina Gamberzky, from January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
* All reports of investigation concerning or relating to the release
of personnel records of Anna Paulina Luna, also known as Anna
Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky.
* All communications with any representative or employee of _The New
York Times_ concerning or relating to Anna Paulina Luna, also known as
Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, from January
1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
* All communications with any representative or employee of Due
Diligence Group, LLC (“DDG”) concerning or relating to Anna
Paulina Luna, also known as Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna
Paulina Gamberzky, from January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
* All communications with any representative or employee of The
Washington Post concerning or relating to Anna Paulina Luna, also
known as Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, from
January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
* All communications with any representative or employee of _The
Associated __Press_ concerning or relating to Anna Paulina Luna, also
known as Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, from
January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
* All communications with any representative or employee
of _Politico_ concerning or relating to Anna Paulina Luna, also
known as Anna Paulina Mayerhofer and/or Anna Paulina Gamberzky, from
January 1, 2019 to March 7, 2023.
According to the suit, on February 13, 2023, the U.S. House Committee
on Armed Services and U.S. House Committee on Oversight and
Accountability disclosed
[[link removed]]
the
Air Force had improperly revealed the unredacted records of at least
11 Republican congressional candidates, who are Air Force veterans, to
the research firm Due Diligence Group.
The Due Diligence Group is a vendor for Democratic Party campaign
committees. According to the_ Washington Examiner
[[link removed]
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign, which seeks to elect Democrats to
the Senate, gave the Due Diligence Group $173,000 during the 2022
election cycle as well as another three payments of more than $30,000
after the election, according to the Federal Election Commission.
Additionally, the political research firm received more than $110,000
from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee between January
2021 and December 2022, filings show.
“The USAF leaked information of USAF candidates in the 2022
midterms to a DEMOCRAT OPPO research firm,” Luna tweeted
[[link removed]]
on
February 27, 2023. “Yes, I also have reason to believe my records
were leaked. This is likely going to be a criminal investigation.”
Luna joined
[[link removed]]
the
Air Force at age 19 and spent six years in the military, including
five on active duty.
The Biden Air Force improperly disclosed confidential personnel files
on candidates opposing Democrats, such as Rep. Anna Paulina Luna.
Judicial Watch filed this lawsuit because this abuse may be a crime
and now the Biden administration is trying to cover up the scandal.
Until next week,
[Contribute]
[[link removed]]
<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%;height:auto;" alt="advertisement"></a>
[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024
202.646.5172
© 2017 - 2023, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
View in browser
[[link removed]]