Dear Friend,
Today, Planned Parenthood and one of the state’s more
notorious abortionists, Dr. Beverly Gray from Durham, filed suit
against North Carolina’s new pro-life law, Senate Bill 20, two weeks
before it goes into effect.
We expected the abortion industry to defend its revenue
stream in the state that saw the biggest increase in abortion after
Roe v. Wade was repealed almost one year ago in the Dobbs
vs. Mississippi case. Afterall, North Carolina saw a 37%
increase in abortions after Dobbs, due to its
liberal abortion laws allowing abortion up to 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Planned Parenthood and Dr. Gray sued as Defendants the least likely
people in the state to defend the law—the Attorney General Josh Stein
who unequivocally stated he would not defend the law, the Secretary of
Health and Human Services who does not want to have to implement the
law, and the District Attorneys in the counties where Planned
Parenthood clinics are located—the most liberal cities in North
Carolina. Glaringly not named as defendants are the two leaders of the
General Assembly—Senate President Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim
Moore—which passed the law. The lawsuit seeks to declare the new law
unconstitutional, unenforceable, and permanently
enjoined.
This lawsuit is indicative of the desperation of the
abortion industry to continue murdering unborn children so they can
profit financially. Because the abortion industry cannot win
in the ballot booth by electing enough abortion extremists to office,
they seek to overturn the will of the people’s duly elected
representatives—the North Carolina General Assembly. The lawsuit
attempts to create confusion, where there is none and to limit the
power of the people to pass laws that place reasonable, popular, and
common-sense limits on abortion. The people of North Carolina have
said through elections and in poll after poll that they do not want
unrestricted abortion on demand up to birth, yet that is what the
abortion industry is seeking through this
lawsuit.
The Planned Parenthood lawsuit seeks to strike down
informed consent, science-based safety regulations on chemical
abortion pills, health and safety regulations, and reporting
requirements. For instance, they object to a requirement
that abortions after 12 weeks (which would only include abortions for
life limiting fetal anomalies, rape, incest, and medical emergencies)
be performed only in a hospital. They object to giving women seeking
surgical and chemical abortions ALL of the information about
complications and risks associated with abortion. They object to
requiring this information be given by the doctor in person, so the
woman can ask questions and interact with her doctor. They object to
having to tell the woman the doctor’s name that will perform the
abortion. They object to being required to follow the FDA protocol on
abortion pills, that it is indicated only up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.
I challenge the abortion industry and particularly Dr. Beverly Gray to
specifically say how this law harms women. Making abortionists
disclose all the risks and complications of abortion, perform
abortions in a hospital after the first trimester, give women a chance
to ask questions of the doctor, abide by FDA regulations on abortion
pills, only protects the health and safety of women. Health and safety
is not harming women. Apparently, Planned
Parenthood does not care about the health and safety of the women to
whom they provide abortions; thus the name “abortion
mills”.
The law, known as the “Care for Women, Children, and
Families Act” also provides care and nurture to women who
experience unplanned pregnancies. It forces abortion clinics to
provide safe and adequate facilities comparable to other ambulatory
surgical facilities. It provides maternal care, child care, a college
education, paid parental leave for state employees, and housing for
pregnant women. It seeks to reduce infant mortality and morbidity and
allows for safe surrender of an infant up to 30 days old. It’s hard
to believe that women who might seek an abortion would want all of
these “safety-net” provisions struck down in court. Planned
Parenthood said it filed the suit on behalf of its patients. Maybe
they should have asked their patients before they filed suit, because
statistics show that 76% of women who have had abortions would choose
life for their babies if their circumstances were different. But,
Planned Parenthood wants women to remain in dire circumstances, so
they can spend their money on an abortion, instead of giving life to
the best thing that may ever happen to them. The law that Planned
Parenthood seeks to strike down would give women the opportunity to
choose life instead of abortion. It’s life-giving both for the baby
and the mother.
If
you support our work fighting hard to protect the unborn, and to put
abortion mills like Planned Parenthood out of
business,
would you consider making a needed
end-of-month or one-time donation
today?
Sincerely,
Tami & Team, NC Values
|