I am concerned that enshrining in the Constitution a Voice that covers all areas of “executive government” presents a real risk.

Dear
Friend,
Recently, you might have received an e-mail from Peter Dutton about the Voice.

I am concerned that enshrining in the Constitution a Voice that covers all areas of “executive government” presents a real risk.

Like most people, I am in favour of constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians.

However, what is being proposed is a Voice that can speak to every part of the federal government, with the potential for recommendations to be litigated if they are rejected.

This could create a constitutional quagmire. There is a risk that a future High Court could place an interpretation on the Voice which goes beyond the current expectations of the Government.

The Liberal team will highlight these risks to everyday Australians.

However, making these arguments in the face of political, corporate and celebrity support for the ‘yes’ campaign will be a challenge.

Can you support Peter Dutton and the Liberal Team with a donation?

You can make a secure donation here:
[link removed] ([link removed])

This Voice is constitutionally risky.

Its effects are unknown, as are key details about how it would operate.

Furthermore, this Voice would be permanent.

Every dollar donated will go to communicating key messages to everyday Australians.

Thank you for your support.

Regards,
John Howard OM AC
Former Prime Minister

I'll donate to help stop Labor's Voice ([link removed])


============================================================
Authorised by A. Hirst for the Liberal Party of Australia.
Corner of Blackall and Macquarie Streets, Barton ACT 2600.
** Click here to unsubscribe from this list. ([link removed])