From Campaign for Accountability <[email protected]>
Subject CfA Newsletter - June 2
Date June 2, 2023 4:29 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Voter Deception Campaign Tied to Leonard Leo

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** CfA's June 2, 2023 Newsletter
------------------------------------------------------------
With your support, Campaign for Accountability is working to expose corruption and hold the powerful accountable.


** This Week's Updates:
------------------------------------------------------------
The Deceptive Anti-Abortion Campaign with Ties to Leonard Leo
Last year, Kansas voters chose to reject an amendment to the state constitution that would have explicitly eliminated the right to abortion using language that alluded to – but did not explicitly protect – exceptions for rape, incest or threats to the life of the mother. The entire campaign was mired in similar obfuscation, with supporters of the amendment attempting to convince Kansans ([link removed]) that a “yes” vote would not lead to an abortion ban. One anti-abortion organization, the Do Right PAC, was heavily criticized for sending voters a text message which read “Voting YES on the Amendment will give women a choice. Vote YES to protect women’s health.” This week, new reporting ([link removed]) from Lever News revealed that the deceptive texts were linked to Leonard Leo, who donated $1.7 million to CatholicVote Civic Action
via the Concord Fund. CatholicVote, in turn, provided nearly 90% of the funding for the Do Right PAC.

CfA has previously urged ([link removed]) the IRS to investigate seven non-profits (including the Concord Fund) that appear to have funneled large amounts of money to Leo via his private businesses. According to CfA’s analysis, more than $73 million dollars made its way to Leo’s for-profit operations, which could be evidence of explicit and coordinated self-enrichment in violation of IRS rules.
Meta Fights FTC Ruling
In early May, the FTC claimed that Meta had violated its 2012 and 2020 privacy orders, the FTC Act, and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (COPPA). The agency then proposed changes ([link removed]) to an existing privacy order with Meta, which included a blanket prohibition on the monetization of children’s data, a pause on new products to assess privacy compliance, and sharper limits for facial recognition technology. Now, Meta is suing ([link removed]) to block the FTC’s order by claiming that the agency doesn’t have the authority to take further enforcement action, and that only a federal court – which approved the settlement – can modify restrictions. The Meta’s lawyers claim that the tech giant would suffer irreparable injury if the FTC’s new restrictions are
implemented. You can read Meta’s motion for an injunction here ([link removed]) .
FTC Cracks Down on Ring’s Unlawful Surveillance
On Wednesday, the FTC announced ([link removed]) that it was taking enforcement actions against Ring, a home-security company which sells internet enabled cameras and sensors that can be monitored from a user’s phone. The agency’s complaint ([link removed]) alleged that Ring had failed to take basic security precautions, which allowed one software engineer to download thousands of videos of women ([link removed]) taken inside their homes. It was only after another employee stalked a female coworker through her Ring camera that the company took action to narrow access to user data. On top these glaring security issues, the FTC also claims
that Ring subjected customers’ videos to “extensive human review” without adequately notifying them or seeking their consent. The FTC has ordered Ring to delete algorithms or other products it developed using that illegally gathered information.


** What We're Reading:
------------------------------------------------------------

Florida elections officials change campaign finance guidelines, potentially aiding DeSantis allies ([link removed])

A lawyer used ChatGPT to cite bogus cases. What are the ethics? ([link removed])

House Committee Launches Probe into FTC Chair Lina Khan ([link removed])


** Follow Our Work:
------------------------------------------------------------
We thank you for your continued support. Without people like you, our work would not be possible.

Here is how you can stay involved and help us accomplish our mission:
1. Follow CfA on Twitter ([link removed]) .
2. Follow the Tech Transparency Project on Twitter ([link removed]) .
3. Tell your friends and colleagues ([link removed]) about CfA.
4. Send us a tip ([link removed]) .
5. Make a tax-deductible donation ([link removed]) .

Be on the lookout for more updates about our work in the upcoming weeks. Thanks again for signing up to be a part of CfA!

Sincerely,

Michelle Kuppersmith
Executive Director, Campaign for Accountability

============================================================

** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])

Copyright © 2023 Campaign for Accountability, All rights reserved.
You signed up for this list at campaignforaccountability.org

Our mailing address is:
Campaign for Accountability
611 Pennsylvania Ave SE
#337
Washington, District Of Columbia 20003
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis