This is the Daily Media Update published by the Institute for Free Speech. For press inquiries, please contact [email protected].  
In the News

By Jordan Boyd
.....Shortly after the school district pulled the handful of explicit books, parents gathered at a Feb. 15, 2022 Forsyth County Board of Education meeting to express their concern that children were being exposed to even more explicit books via the school system.
One attendee, Alison Hair, only got a few words into reading an excerpt from one of the other explicit library books that still sat on FCS shelves before she was cut off by the board for allegedly violating meeting rules.
“If you continue with your statement just please, we have other people that are younger in this [room],” one board member told Hair.
“If it is inappropriate to read in this building, then it is inappropriate, inappropriate to be in a library,” Hair said. “How dare you say ‘Oh, well, there’s minors in here.’ Wait, what is it? My son’s a minor and this book that you all have copies is in my son’s middle school.”
Hair’s frustrations were echoed by more than a dozen other parents...
In a complaint filed in July 2022, Mama Bears of Forsyth members Hair, who was barred from school board meetings after attempting to read from another explicit passage in March, and Martin alleged that the Forsyth County Board of Education violated their First Amendment rights as parents to speak up about what kind of reading materials their children are exposed to.
“This lawsuit does not try to resolve the question of which books should be available in school libraries, but instead addresses unlawful attempts to sanitize how parents speak about those books in the presence of elected officials and other adults,” the lawsuit states.
In February 2023, a judge ruled that the FCS board violated Hair and Martin’s constitutional rights and must pay $100,000 in legal fees.
New from the Institute for Free Speech

.....A recent change to Maine law creates an unfair and unconstitutional system that gives even more influence to the most powerful political leaders and curtails political speech rights for legislators and donors alike.
That’s why state Representative Laurel Libby and others, including would-be donors, are suing to overturn these restrictions, which violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution...
The new law restricts leadership PAC contributions to just $475 per individual per year while also banning any contributions from business entities...
“Laws that limit the amount of money a person may give to these committees intrude upon the First Amendment freedoms of speech and association,” said Institute for Free Speech Senior Attorney Charles Miller, co-counsel for plaintiffs. “These limits not only infringe on the rights of donors, but on the rights of advocacy groups and the people who operate them as well, including Representative Libby.” ...
To read the complaint in the case, Libby, et al., v. Schneider, et al., click here.
Supreme Court
 
By Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
.....The Supreme Court recently reversed the conviction of a onetime aide and campaign manager for disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The decision may have surprised those who follow Albany’s culture of corruption, but it was thoroughly in keeping with the recent history of the Supreme Court. The Roberts court has been busy deregulating corruption for over a decade.
The Courts
 
By Joe Dodson
.....A Fourth Circuit majority agreed Wednesday with a district court's determination that Virginia Tech's bias response team does not have a chilling effect on free speech.
"Our country rightfully places great value on the freedom of speech, and any statute or regulation implicating speech receives close scrutiny," the ruling states. "Freedom of speech, after all, is expressly protected in the very first of the original amendments to our Constitution. But the First Amendment does not stand in the way of modest efforts to encourage civility on college campuses."
The opinion penned by U.S. Circuit Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, a Bill Clinton appointee, came after oral arguments in October.
.....Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed a proposed friend-of-the-court brief Tuesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit urging it to protect Americans’ right to speak and associate anonymously, free from government-mandated disclosure.
By Shayna Jacobs
.....Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) argued on Tuesday that hush money paid in 2016 to adult film actress Stormy Daniels allegedly on Donald Trump’s behalf was not part of an official presidential act and cannot not be grounds for the case being removed to a federal court.
The filing was in response to a recent bid by lawyers for Trump who want his 34-count indictment — which includes charges such as falsifying business records — to be transferred from state criminal court to U.S. District Court in Manhattan...
“If an elected official’s political campaign activities do not amount to official conduct, then the campaign activities of a person who has not yet been elected to a federal office do not amount to official conduct either,” the prosecutors wrote in a 32-page legal memo.
Trump lawyers previously argued that some of the payments to Cohen at issue were made after Trump had begun his term, making the matter eligible to be transferred to a federal venue.
FEC
 
By Taylor Giorno
.....Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis may have violated federal campaign finance law when his old state-level PAC reportedly transferred tens of millions of dollars to the pro-DeSantis super PAC Never Back Down, the nonpartisan watchdog Campaign Legal Center alleges in new complaint with the Federal Election Commission filed Tuesday morning.
Free Expression

By Jacob Mchangama and Jeff Kosseff
.....According to a new landmark decision by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), freedom of expression does not immunize public officials from criminal liability if they fail to promptly remove manifestly illegal content (such as “hate speech”) posted on their accounts by followers. The recent decision reveals the censorial route that Europe’s judiciary is choosing, and it provides a cautionary tale as the U.S. Supreme Court faces many challenges to its robust protections for online speech.
By Joe Lancaster
.....Rock musician Roger Waters, founder and onetime frontman of Pink Floyd, performed concerts in Berlin on May 17 and 18. During a couple of his former band's classic songs, Waters donned a black military-style uniform with a red armband and fired a prop machine gun into the crowd. The costume bore more than a passing resemblance to a Nazi SS uniform, though with two crossed hammers instead of a swastika.
Last week, Berlin police announced an investigation into Waters' sartorial choices and whether they constitute incitement to violence. Unfortunately, the investigation is part of a trend among European nations that cuts against the principles of a free society.
The States
 
Politico (New Jersey Playbook)How should state government use AI?
By Daniel Han
.....Artificial intelligence can write political op-eds and make Gov. Phil Murphy diss tracks. But how should it be used by the state government?
bill introduced last week by state Sen. Troy Singleton (D-Burlington) caught my eye. It would create an Artificial Intelligence Officer — who would be a subject matter expert on the issue — tasked with regulating the use of artificial intelligence and automated systems in state government. The bill doesn’t directly create rules around artificial intelligence use in state government, but deputizes the new officer to do so. A newly created Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board would advise state agencies on artificial intelligence use and provide feedback on the officer’s proposed regulations.
“I don’t think it’s in our best interest for me as a state legislator to try to overprescribe what that public policy [around artificial intelligence] looks like,” Singleton said in an interview. “We should set up a mechanism to allow individuals with deep experience in this area to utilize that experience to frame out what that public policy should look like.”
By Naomi Nix and Cristiano Lima
.....Meta is threatening to block users in California from sharing news articles on its social media networks to protest a state legislative proposal that would force tech companies to pay publishers for their content.
The social media giant said Wednesday that if the California Journalism Preservation Act passes, the company would “be forced” to pull news from Facebook and Instagram in the state rather than agree to pay news outlets the journalism usage fee that the bill would require.
Read an article you think we would be interested in? Send it to Tiffany Donnelly at [email protected]. For email filters, the subject of this email will always begin with "Institute for Free Speech Media Update."  
The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. Please support the Institute's mission by clicking here. For further information, visit www.ifs.org 
Follow the Institute for Free Speech