I suppose I’ll be accused of being unkind, uncouth or maybe even unhinged, but why in the world does the La Crosse Tribune feel compelled to write about the “unhoused”?
The Tribune uses the word as both an adjective and a noun. They write about “unhoused people,” the “unhoused community,” the “unhoused population” and, also, just the plain old “unhoused.”
What they don’t write about any longer, at least in the story I saw dated May 21, is “the homeless” — a term which some people now consider derogatory.
Neither the reporter who wrote the story (it’s actually a pretty good story about the large homeless population in La Crosse) or the executive editor of the paper returned my call. So I don’t know if they’re among those people. But I do know that the label “homeless” now implies that one is “less than” and that it “undermines self-esteem and progressive change,” according to the website for an organization called Unhoused.org.
The term “unhoused,” on the other hand, “implies there is a moral and social assumption that everyone should be housed in the first place.”
|