The Latest from the Prospect
 â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â
Â
View this email in your browser
<[link removed]>
**MAY 24, 2023**
Kuttner on TAP
****
****
****
****
****
****
****
**** The Global Race to the Bottom
Will the Biden administration help Big Tech undermine consumer
regulation by the EU and Asian nations?
Critics of corporate-led globalism aptly point out that it usually
creates a race to the bottom. Examples include trade deals that
deliberately weaken the capacity of nation-states to regulate
capitalism; competition to cut tax rates to attract multinational
business; proliferation of tax and regulatory havens; invention of new
concepts such as investor rights against states; and anti-consumer
rights of tech companies in trade agreements.
Once in a while, however, globalization seems to create a regulatory
race to the top. Consider the EU's recent actions on data privacy,
where the EU has better standards.
This week, the EU levied a 1.2 billion euro fine (about $1.3 billion)
against Meta, the parent corporation of Facebook, because of
Facebook's practice of transferring European user data back to the
U.S. without the safeguards required by European privacy laws. The
actual order came via the Republic of Ireland, where Facebook's
European operations are based for tax purposes (neatly illustrating the
race-to-the-bottom flip side).
The Irish Data Protection Commission directed Meta to cease all
transfers to the U.S. of all personal data belonging to users in the EU.
The commission held that Meta's data practices violated the EU's
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rules, which go far beyond
data privacy protections in the U.S.
Ideally, Europe's consumer protections would prod the U.S. to
reciprocate. But in March 2022, President Biden helped Big Tech by
issuing an executive order
****trying to implement a preliminary deal
<[link removed]>
with the EU for a "Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework." This adds
some new protections, but also undercuts the EU's ability to regulate
unilaterally. The deal does not yet have final approval of the EU.
Facebook is a serial offender when it comes to data privacy violations.
In 2019, the FTC fined Facebook $5 billion
<[link removed]>
for violating an earlier 2012 FTC order requiring the company to cease
deceptive practices that misled users on privacy settings. According to
the FTC, these tactics allowed the company to share users' personal
information with third-party apps that were downloaded by the user's
Facebook "friends." This was during the Trump administration when the
FTC had a Republican chair.
While the Biden administration deserves great credit for reviving
antitrust enforcement, in many respects the EU has been the tougher
antitrust regulator, blocking some mergers that had not been blocked by
U.S. authorities. The EU has tough new rules on platform "gatekeepers,"
<[link removed]> designed to apply to
Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta (Facebook), and Microsoft.
Today, trade ministers are meeting in Detroit to negotiate more details
of the pending Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF)
<[link removed]>, which was cooked up by the
U.S. The deal includes digital provisions written by Big Tech
specifically to use a trade agreement to circumvent national consumer,
privacy, and competition regulations.
Granted, no national governments have totally clean hands. The EU has
its own nationalistic reasons for wanting to hold U.S.-based tech giants
to a higher standard of accountability. But to the extent that we get
good regulation at all, it is national. Bad deregulation tends to be
global.
The idea of "national champions" has been resurrected as part of
Biden's industrial policy, which also demands that beneficiaries of
government subsidy have decent labor standards. As tech giants based in
the U.S. are in the role of national champions, our government needs to
make them clean up their acts, and not collude with Big Tech in
weakening foreign consumer and antitrust regulation.
~ ROBERT KUTTNER
To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to
subscribe. <[link removed]>
Follow Robert Kuttner on Twitter <[link removed]>
[link removed]
At Least Free the Debt Ceiling Hostage
<[link removed]>
Today's X-Date PM: If the White House is so interested in a bipartisan
deal, it should include a mechanism to end these crises permanently. BY
DAVID DAYEN
How Washington Bargained Away Rural America
<[link removed]>
Every five years, the farm bill brings together Democrats and
Republicans who are normally at each other's throats. The result is
the continued corporatization of agriculture. BY LUKE GOLDSTEIN
The Lose-Lose DeSantis-Disney Fight
<[link removed]>
As Disney cancels investments in Florida, the proxy culture war masks a
battle between a governor pretending to slay big business and a
mega-corporation wanting to entrench its power. BY RAMENDA CYRUS
Â
The White House Wants a Debt Ceiling Deal
<[link removed]>
By opposing an injunction in the main lawsuit challenging the debt
ceiling, the president has deliberately boxed himself into negotiations
with legislative terrorists. BY DAVID DAYEN
[link removed]
Click to Share this Newsletter
[link removed]
Â
[link removed]
Â
[link removed]
Â
[link removed]
Â
[link removed]
YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
<[link removed]>
The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Copyright (c) 2023 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here
<[link removed]>.
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here
<[link removed]>.
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters,
click here
<[link removed]>.