From Peter Wagner <[email protected]>
Subject How counties can strike fairer contracts for jail services
Date February 7, 2020 3:36 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Three new "best practices" guides

Prison Policy Initiative updates for February 7, 2020 Showing how mass incarceration harms communities and our national welfare

Our new "best practices" guides show counties how to strike fairer contracts for jail services [[link removed]] Most "consumers" of telecom services in jails are families in poverty. Counties can and should negotiate contracts that treat them more fairly. [[link removed]]

The average cost of a phone call from a Texas county jail is 44 cents per minute1 — which can add up to hundreds of dollars a month for families trying to stay in touch — but Dallas County may soon lower its rates to 1 cent per minute. How? The county is aggressively renegotiating its contract with jail phone provider Securus, prioritizing getting the lowest rate possible for the families making the calls.

For other counties wondering how to negotiate contracts that treat consumers more fairly, we've just published three "best practices" guides. Our three guides cover the three most common types of telecommunications contracts in jails: contracts for phone services [[link removed]], contracts for video calling technology [[link removed]], and contracts for electronic tablets [[link removed]].

The simplest and best policy for a county is to pay for these services out of its general fund, thus making communication free. (Otherwise, personal wealth determines which families can stay in touch and which families can't.)

For counties that won't go that far, though, it's still possible to write a jail contract that holds the vendor accountable, and allows families to stay in touch without paying dearly. Our best practices guides show how smart agencies can:

Get the lowest rates possible for families by refusing commissions Protect customers from predatory fees, such as unnecessary "account maintenance" fees or high deposit fees. Make sure that vendors return customers' unspent funds Make sure that vendors return customers' unspent funds Ensure that expensive technology is never used to "replace" vital (and free) existing services Avoid excluding good providers from the bidding process by accident

During the contract award process, county procurement officials are often outmatched by their counterparts in the jail telecom industry — highly experienced businesspeople intent on maximizing their returns. Because of this imbalance, far too many poor families end up paying hundreds or thousands of dollars a month to stay in touch. But county governments that do their homework can get families a fairer deal.

To learn more, see our new best practices guides about:

Phone services [[link removed]] Video calling technology [[link removed]] Electronic tablets [[link removed]]

And if you are new to these issues, see our research and advocacy about phone services in prisons and jails [[link removed]], protecting in-person visits from the video calling industry [[link removed]], and exploitation on prison tablets [[link removed]].

Footnotes

Our survey of jail phone rates in 2018 found that the average cost of a phone call in Texas county jails was $6.53 for a 15-minute call, or approximately 44 cents per minute. For the complete results of our survey, see Appendix 2 in our report State of Phone Justice. [[link removed]]

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Other news: Can consumer protection laws protect people in prisons and jails? [[link removed]]

In a recent article for the Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal, The Company Store and the Literally Captive Market, [[link removed]] our volunteer attorney Stephen Raher explains how incarcerated people and their families are treated like second-class consumers, how prison retail companies have managed to dodge accountability, and what can be done about it.

Read the full article. [[link removed]]

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Our other newsletters Ending prison gerrymandering ( archives [[link removed]]) Criminal justice research library ( archives) [[link removed]]

Update which newsletters you get [link removed].

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website [[link removed]] or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative [[link removed]]

PO Box 127

Northampton, Mass. 01061

Web Version [link removed] Unsubscribe [link removed] Update address / join other newsletters [link removed] Donate [[link removed]] Tweet this newsletter [link removed] Forward this newsletter [link removed]

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative

PO Box 127 Northampton, Mass. 01061

Web Version [link removed] | Update address [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed] | Share via: Twitter [link removed] Facebook [[link removed] Email [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis