From Alex Falconer, Save the Boundary Waters <[email protected]>
Subject Your questions about the bill hearing yesterday answered
Date February 6, 2020 10:36 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
" Ex-Forest Service chief at House hearing: Don’t make Boundary Waters testing ground for acid mine drainage [[link removed]] :" Minnesota Reformer, February 5, 2020.

"The administration has refused to disclose the findings of any of that evidence to either Congress or the public,”...“If this review had truly suggested that sulfide ore copper mining does not threaten the Boundary Waters, then I would assume they would simply have completed and released the study." - Thomas Tidwell, Retired Forest Service ChiefYesterday, the House Natural Resources Committee held a hearing on Rep. Betty McCollum’s bill H.R. 5598, a bill entitled “The Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection and Pollution Prevention Act,” in the U.S. House of Representatives. You might have heard a number of red herrings and falsehoods from those opposed to H.R. 5598.

Read our full blog post here - [link removed] - correcting the record.
Rep. McCollum's bill would permanently remove the threat of sulfide-ore mining in the watershed of the BWCAW and establish the protections needed to keep two national treasures - both the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and Voyageurs National Park - pristine for all generations to come.

[link removed]

You are receiving this e-mail because you have supported the Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters - a project of Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness. Visit our supporter portal [[link removed]] to update your information. If you wish to no longer receive e-mail from us, you may unsubscribe: [link removed] .
Save the Boundary Waters
P.O. Box 625
Ely, MN 55731
United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis