From Harriet and Stephen, Anthropocene Alliance <[email protected]>
Subject Call to Mitigate Flooding by Banning “Fill and Build” Construction Picks Up Steam
Date May 15, 2023 12:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed] [[link removed]]

Call to Mitigate Flooding by Banning “Fill and Build” Construction Picks Up Steam
by Greg M. Schwartz

[[link removed]]
Flooding from street, August 18, 2021. Brighton, MI. Photo: Amber Bismack

A national campaign to ban what’s known as “fill and build” is picking up steam, with Anthropocene Alliance partnering with a coalition of allies to raise awareness about the dangers of this controversial practice. Ostensibly aimed at protecting new homes from flooding by using fill dirt that is graded and packed to elevate building sites, fill and build sheds stormwaters into the lower surrounding homes and communities, making them even more vulnerable to catastrophic flooding.

The problem has grown worse in recent years due to increasing heavy weather from climate change [[link removed]] .

Building on wetlands is unsustainable

“We have developers building on wetland areas that can’t hold water anymore so it just flows off onto us,” A2 member Amber Bismack told The Guardian [[link removed]] last year about how her neighborhood in Brighton, Michigan near Detroit flooded 15 times in seven years. Bismack leads the group Residents Working Against Huron River Flooding, and noted that depression from dealing with the recurring floods had become a serious mental health issue in the area.

“Fill and build is not a solution to anything. Fill and build is the problem,” hydrologist and A2 consultant Steve Emerman told E&E News’ ClimateWire [[link removed]] last year. Other states with A2 member communities impacted by fill and build include Florida [[link removed]] , South Carolina, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and New York.

In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, Dawne Dunton founded Saving Island Green Wildlife & Beyond [[link removed]] to halt harmful fill and build development near a wildlife refuge. FEMA’s flood zone maps indicate more than one-third of Island Green is considered a flood plain, making it particularly vulnerable to inundation as home owners have found. “Our community still has a little less than 100 acres that haven't been clear-cut yet for development, and we would like to keep it that way,” Dunton says.

[[link removed]]
Clearcut fill and build flooding in Island Green, August 3, 2021. Photo: Charles Slate

“Every bit of green space is being turned into housing,” Emerman concluded after visiting Island Green last year, noting that developers have been buying up all the golf courses for housing developments. “You can really see how every new house is elevated from the surroundings.”

Emerman says there’s “no organizational logic” for where all of the drainage is going, which is odd "because this concept that you need organization of drainage goes back to the origins of civilization!”

[[link removed]]
Flooding in Island Green, August 19, 2022, Photo: Bernadette Sandlass

Inadequate stormwater planning increases flood risk

The failure to produce cogent stormwater plans at Island Green and elsewhere led to an attempt by the South Carolina Environmental Law Clinic to use the Freedom of Information Act to get the stormwater management plans from two local developers. But the FOIA effort was rebuffed when Horry County officials claimed the plans were “subject to copyright” and directed such queries to the firms in question. The secretive response left Emerman dumbfounded; he’s never seen a municipality refuse such a request before with most just posting such stormwater reports on public websites.
Fill and build and related issues have prompted A2 and partners (including the Environmental Defense Fund, National Resources Defense Council, Union of Concerned Scientists & Association of State Floodplain managers) to send a signatory letter [[link removed]] to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requesting a meeting to discuss a needed overhaul of the Agency’s outdated National Flood Insurance Program.

In a New York Times editorial [[link removed]] last year, Pulitzer Prize nominated author Elizabeth Rush reported that the number of properties facing flood risk in much of the country — in part due to fill and build — is nearly twice as high as FEMA currently estimates, according to experts at the First Street Foundation in New York City. Rush noted that land-use criteria for flood insurance eligibility upon which building and zoning ordinances are based hadn’t been updated since 1976. One of the areas that must be critically examined is fill and build.

To join the campaign to ban fill and build, please visit here [[link removed]] .

[link removed] [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
[link removed] [[link removed]]
This email was sent to [email protected]
If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please unsubscribe: [link removed] .
Anthropocene Alliance
105 NE Bay Ave
Micanopy, FL 32667
United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis