From Tom Fitton <[email protected]>
Subject Election Lawsuit Success!
Date May 13, 2023 5:40 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Biden Border Crisis Updates!



[INSIDE JW]

Pennsylvania Settles Voter Roll Lawsuit with Judicial Watch

[[link removed]]
Here’s the latest in our many successes for cleaner elections.

Judicial Watch settled
[[link removed]]
an important federal election integrity lawsuit against Pennsylvania
and five of its counties.

Pennsylvania admitted in court filings that it removed 178,258
ineligible registrations thanks to Judicial Watch pressure. The new
settlement specifically commits Pennsylvania and five of its counties
to extensive public reporting of statistics regarding their ongoing
voter roll clean-up efforts for the next five years, along with a
payment to us of $15,000 for legal costs and fees.

In November 2021, we filed an amended complaint
[[link removed]]
in our ongoing National Voter Registration Act (NVRA
[[link removed]])
lawsuit
[[link removed]].
The amended
complaint sought to compel Pennsylvania and five of its counties
(Luzerne County, Cumberland County, Washington County, Indiana County
and Carbon County) to comply with their voter list-maintenance
obligations under Section 8 of the NVRA (_Judicial Watch, Inc. v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. _(No. 1:20-cv-00708)).

In the settlement agreement, Pennsylvania agreed to publish the total
number of registered and eligible voters (active and inactive) in the
five counties by June 30 of each year on the Department of State’s
website, for the next five years.
It also agreed to publish the total number of address confirmation
notices sent to registered voters and the number returned as
undeliverable or not responded to. It also will publish the total
number of voters removed from the registration rolls on account of
death, or for failing to respond to an address confirmation notice and
failing to vote in the two most recent federal general elections.

We alleged
[[link removed]]
a “multi-year failure” to take reasonable steps to maintain
accurate voter registration lists as required by federal law. On April
22, 2021, we sent a notice-of-violation letter
[[link removed]]
to the Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth setting forth a
range of violations by the Commonwealth and 27 identified counties.

In September 2021, Pennsylvania informed
[[link removed]]
the
court:

> Upon receiving the [April 22, 2021] letter, the Secretary [of the
> Commonwealth] immediately took action by investigating the issues
> raised and working with the identified 27 counties to remove
> outstanding inactive voters who had failed to return a confirmation
> notice and did not participate in the subsequent two consecutive
> federal elections. With the Secretary’s assistance, the counties
> removed every single inactive voter eligible for removal from the
> rolls. The total inactive voters removed was 178,258.
Separately, a 2020 letter from us to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania,
led to the removal of 69,000 outdated registrations. According to a
January 14, 2020, CBS news report
[[link removed]],
“This mountain of faulty registrations has now courted the attention
of the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.” David Voye,
Elections Manager for the county told CBS, “I would concede that we
are behind on culling our rolls,” and that this had “been put on
the backburner.” Allegheny County later confirmed
[[link removed]]
to us on January 31, 2020 that the removals had occurred.

Pennsylvania’s election rolls are cleaner – and will remain
cleaner – thanks to us. This federal lawsuit settlement is good
news for voters in Pennsylvania who want to ensure that only eligible
voters are on voter rolls. Our remarkable run of litigation successes
resulted in well over 2 million ineligible registrations being removed
from voter rolls across the nation in the last two years!

As you know, we are a national leader in voting integrity and voting
rights. As part of its work, we assembled a team of highly experienced
voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in
Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and
Kentucky, among other achievements
[[link removed]].

In March 2023, Colorado agreed
[[link removed]]
to settle our NVRA lawsuit alleging that Colorado failed to remove
ineligible voters from its rolls. The settlement agreement requires
Colorado to provide us with the most recent voter roll data for each
Colorado county each year for six years.

In February 2023, Los Angeles County confirmed
[[link removed]]
removal of 1,207,613 ineligible voters from its rolls since last year,
under the terms of a settlement agreement
[[link removed]]
in a federal lawsuit
[[link removed]]
that Judicial Watch filed in 2017.

We settled
[[link removed]]
a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the
city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and
promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter
registration lists.
Kentucky
[[link removed]]
also removed hundreds of thousands of old registrations after it
entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit.

In February 2022, we settled
[[link removed]]
a
voter roll clean-up lawsuit against North Carolina and two of its
counties after North Carolina removed over 430,000 inactive
registrations from its voter rolls.

In March 2022, a Maryland court ruled in favor
[[link removed]]
of our challenge to the Democratic state legislature’s “extreme”
congressional gerrymander.

In May 2022, we sued
[[link removed]]
Illinois on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two other registered
Illinois voters to stop state election officials from extending
Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by federal law.

Robert Popper, a Judicial Watch senior attorney, leads our election
law program. Popper was previously in the Voting Section of the Civil
Rights Division of the Justice Department, where he managed voting
rights investigations, litigations, consent decrees, and settlements
in dozens of states.

RECORDS SHOW CLIMATE ENVOY JOHN KERRY’S OFFICE EMPLOYS 45 PEOPLE

It’s pretty good work if you can get it.

Our FOIA lawsuit forced the release of an organizational chart
[[link removed]]
from the U.S. State Department Office of the Special Presidential
Envoy for Climate John Kerry, which shows that the office employs at
least 45 people. We still don’t know exactly what they do.

We uncovered the record thanks to our September 2022 lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against the State Department for records related to travel costs,
calendars, and organizational charts for the Office of the Special
Presidential Envoy for Climate (_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of
State_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:22-cv-02844)). The Biden agency is releasing responsive records
in batches
[[link removed]]
to us every six weeks.

The organizational chart is titled “Special Presidential Envoy for
Climate Big Picture Org Chart” and dated April 15, 2021. These
positions include:

* eight full-time employees (FTEs) positions;
* 28 “3161s,” which are temporary direct-hires that are commonly
referred to as “3161” after the governing
* federal law, 5 U.S. Code § 3161
[[link removed]]
* three “detailees;”
* two “fellows;”
* one Intergovernmental Personnel Act
[[link removed]]
“IPA” position and
* three “contractor” positions.

The chart shows Kerry and his personal staff assistant at the top of
the organization, with three separate divisions reporting to him,
including a chief of staff, principal deputy envoy for climate, and a
deputy envoy for climate. Additional offices reporting to the three
divisions include: public affairs, communications, and stakeholder
engagement; liaison to the National Climate Task Force; implementation
and ambition team; negotiations team; global innovation and
competitiveness team; public finance team; and private finance and
multinational corporate strategy team.

On April 25, 2023, the _Boston Herald_ reported
[[link removed]],
“House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) is
threatening his subpoena power to see exactly what Kerry, the special
envoy for climate, is up to.” In a letter to Secretary of State
Antony Blinken, Chairman Comer requested details of Kerry’s Climate
Office budget, a list of employees, communications with third parties
and travel records. Kerry told the _Herald_ that he does not plan to
share a list of his office’s staff until October of 2024.

_RealClearInvestigations_ reported
[[link removed]]
on May 3, 2023, that in response to its FOIA request filed last year
for a breakdown on how Kerry’s office spent its approximate $16.5
million 2022 budget, the State Department said it could not comply
with the request until April 2025.

It is incredible that it took a federal lawsuit to find out that
Kerry’s bloated climate office astonishingly employs at least 45
people and that we still have no idea what Kerry or his staff actually
do under law. The on-going stonewalling about what Kerry does shows
the Biden administration’s contempt for transparency, accountability
and the basic right of the American people to know how their tax
dollars are spent.

HHS FAILS TO PROPERLY VET WORKERS WHO CARE FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
MINORS

The Biden administration is engaging in child endangerment by the
thousands by treating the tens of thousands of minors trafficked
across our border not much better than the cartels who sent them
here.. Our _Corruption Chronicle_ blog reports
[[link removed]].


> The scandals keep piling up for the federal agency charged with
> caring for the mobs of illegal immigrant minors—Unaccompanied
> Alien Children (UAC)—that enter the country through the southern
> border. It is known as the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) and
> operates under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
> The latest transgression involves the agency’s failure to fully
> vet workers and contractors who care for the young migrants. It
> comes on the heels of a congressional hearing
>
[[link removed]]
> to address reports that show ORR lost contact with more than 85,000
> UAC in the past two years and that two-thirds of all UAC who leave
> the agency’s care work illegal, full-time jobs, often in factories
> and in hazardous conditions.
>
> A couple of years ago Judicial Watch obtained records
>
[[link removed]
HHS
> documenting 33 incidents of physical and sexual abuse during a
> one-month period at shelters where the government houses UAC until
> they are relocated with a sponsor. Months earlier, the agency got
> slammed in a federal audit
>
[[link removed]]
for failing to
> protect UAC from sexual misconduct at the facilities. During a
> six-month period alone, investigators from the HHS Inspector
> General’s office uncovered more than 750 incidents involving
> sexual misconduct at dozens of shelters housing minor detainees. The
> investigation was launched because ORR-funded facilities for years
> reported allegations of sexual and physical abuse of minors in their
> care, some resulting in criminal convictions. For example, in one
> case a facility employee was convicted of sexually abusing seven UAC
> and in another an employee was convicted of attempting to coerce a
> minor to engage in illicit sexual activity and exchanging explicit
> videos and images with others.
>
> During the Obama administration, when the UAC influx was at its
> peak, ORR placed many of the underage migrants in abusive homes.
> Some were forced to become prostitutes or personal slaves, according
> to a shocking Senate investigation
>
[[link removed]
> ignited bipartisan fury at the time. It was ironic because the Obama
> administration claimed it was rescuing UAC from “persistent
> violence in Central America” only to make their lives worse in the
> U.S. Some of the illegal immigrant youngsters ended up with human
> traffickers while others were exploited for their labor and dozens
> were sexually assaulted, starved or forced to work as practical
> slaves. In one case six Guatemalan minors were placed with human
> traffickers that forced them to live in a decrepit trailer and work
> 12 hours a day on egg farms in the rural Ohio town of Marion.
> Another Guatemalan boy was forced to work 12 hours a day for his
> Virginia sponsor to repay a $6,500 smuggling debt and a boy from El
> Salvador was released to his abusive father even though the kid told
> authorities the father had a history of beating him.
>
> Years later serious problems persist at ORR, which funds and
> oversees dozens of state-licensed care facilities to harbor young
> migrants when they arrive in the U.S. In fiscal year 2021 ORR
> provided shelter for an unprecedented 122,731 UAC, according to
> government figures
>
[[link removed]],
> and this fiscal year the Department of Homeland Security has
> referred 128,904 UAC to ORR. Most of the migrants are over 14 years
> of age and 64% are boys. The majority (47%) come from Guatemala,
> followed by Honduras (29%), El Salvador (13%) and 11% from other
> countries. As of May 2, 2023, there are 8,492 unaccompanied children
> in ORR care and the average length of time a UAC remains in
> government custody is 29 days. “ORR is working to further reduce
> length of care in ways that do not jeopardize the safety or welfare
> of the children,” the agency writes in the document with the
> latest figures. It continues. “The important work happening in
> each of the facilities and programs in the ORR network around the
> country – work ORR has done successfully since 2003 – takes an
> experienced team of competent, hardworking men and women dedicated
> to the welfare of the children.”
>
> The reality is that ORR is endangering the migrant kids by failing
> to properly vet employees who work with them, according to a new HHS
> IG investigation. A report
>
[[link removed]]
issued this
> month blasts the agency for not conducting or documenting all
> required background checks and for failing to complete others in a
> timely manner. “In addition, ORR did not require the
> transportation services contractor we reviewed to conduct background
> checks on employees as required by ORR minimum standards,” the
> watchdog writes in its recently published findings. Investigators
> considered several facilities and conducted site visits during a
> two-month period. They found that ORR was not consistent with
> issuing waivers for FBI fingerprint checks and child abuse and
> neglect checks of employees at emergency intake sites, that public
> records checks used by the sites may not have been reliable and that
> several sites did not ensure secure facility access. Several
> employee background checks “included offenses that may have made
> the employee unsuitable to work with children in a childcare
> setting,” the IG found.

JUDICIAL WATCH CLEANS UP COLORADO VOTING

Our chief investigative reporter, Micah Morrison, takes a look
[[link removed]]
in
_Investigative Report_ at our success in cleaning up Colorado voter
rolls.

> Cleaning up dirty voter rolls is not easy or quick work. Exhibit A:
> Colorado.
>
> Nearly three years ago, Judicial Watch filed a federal lawsuit in
> Colorado
[[link removed]]
after
> gathering evidence that the state was a serial offender in failing
> to comply with the voter list maintenance requirements of the
> National Voter Registration Act. Why does this matter? The
> possibility of ineligible voters at the ballot box creates
> opportunities for fraud and corruption. As JW President Tom Fitton
> puts it: “Cleaner voter rolls mean cleaner elections.”
>
> The JW lawsuit noted that studies had shown that a majority of
> Colorado counties had voter registration rates exceeding 100% of the
> eligible voting-age population. Think about that for a moment:
> dozens of Colorado counties were showing the presence of more voters
> than voting-eligible residents actually residing in the county!
> Federal data also showed that Colorado was lagging in the process of
> removing ineligible voter registrations.
>
> According to the JW lawsuit, the voter registration rates and
> processing issues indicated “an ongoing, systemic problem with
> Colorado’s voter list maintenance efforts” that injured lawfully
> registered voters by “undermining their confidence in the
> integrity of the electoral process, discouraging their participation
> in the democratic process, and instilling in them the fear that
> their legitimate votes will be nullified or diluted.”
>
> In March, the Colorado Secretary of State settled the case—a major
> victory for Judicial Watch
>
[[link removed]],
> but more importantly, for Colorado voters. Even before the
> settlement, JW pressure had resulted in a 78% increase of Colorado
> voter roll removals, from roughly 172,000 to 306,000 per reporting
> period.
>
> The key element of the Colorado settlement: for the next six years,
> the state will annually report to Judicial Watch on its progress in
> cleaning up voter rolls.
>
> But dirty voter rolls are not the only election-integrity issue in
> Colorado. Last month, we reported on a Judicial Watch white paper on
> ERIC, the left-leaning Electronic Registration Information Center.
> Colorado is a member of ERIC. We found plenty of reasons for concern
> about ERIC
[[link removed]],
> including ineffective voter-roll cleanup and sketchy data sharing
> practices. The Judicial Watch white paper warned that ERIC data
> sharing could be in violation of several federal statutes, including
> the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, which regulates how
> Department of Motor Vehicle data can be shared.
>
> In fact, DMV data sharing between ERIC and Colorado has landed the
> state in hot water. In October, Colorado Public Radio reported
>
[[link removed]]
> that Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold had mailed postcards
> to about 30,000 non-citizens notifying them how they could register
> to vote. By law, non-citizens are not permitted to vote
>
[[link removed]]
> in state and local elections.
>
> According to the public radio report, “the problem occurred when
> the state compared a list of potential unregistered voters from a
> multi-state group
[[link removed]]
[that is, ERIC] Colorado
> belongs to, with local DMV records. The DMV data included people who
> hold non-citizen driver’s licenses—which were created to allow
> people without legal residency to drive legally—but a formatting
> error caused the system not to flag them as ineligible.”
>
> The public radio report noted that “the postcards, which were
> printed in English and Spanish and read in part, ‘A message from
> Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold’ inform the recipient
> ‘Our records indicate that you or your household may be eligible
> to vote, but do not appear to be registered at your current
> address.’”
>
> We’ll be watching Colorado closely in the months and years ahead.
> You won’t read much about voter roll reform in the national press,
> but you can read all about it here at Judicial Watch. Nationwide,
> action by Judicial Watch has resulted in important electoral reforms
>
[[link removed]]
> and the removal of two million names from voter rolls over the past
> two years.
>
> Stay tuned. There’s more to come.

AS BUSY SUMMER TRAVEL LOOMS BIDEN AGENCY SENDS AIR MARSHALS BACK TO
MEXICAN BORDER

Once again the Biden administration is putting air travelers at risk,
according
[[link removed]]
to
our _Corruption Chronicles_ blog:

> With the busy summer season approaching for air travel, the Biden
> administration is once again compromising aviation security by
> plucking Federal Air Marshals (FAM) from their congressionally
> mandated duty of protecting the nation’s transportation system to
> help on the Mexican border. The highly skilled law enforcement
> agents will not be performing work related to their training, but
> rather babysitting illegal immigrants, conducting welfare checks,
> hospital watch and transportation services, according to Homeland
> Security sources interviewed by Judicial Watch. “They are
> disgusted,” said Sonya Hightower-LaBosco, a retired FAM who serves
> as executive director of the Air Marshal National Council. “They
> feel for their brothers and sisters in the Border Patrol, but this
> is not what they train for, and it leaves a big void in aviation
> safety.”
>
> The assignments to the southern border begin this week, according to
> a memorandum circulated among FAM staff and shared with Judicial
> Watch. It says that all field offices will increase their deployment
> personnel beginning at the end of May through June 17 and that
> Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is requesting 175 air marshals
> plus seven supervisors per “wave,” an increase of 26% “per
> wave.” That seems to indicate the deployment cycles’ substantial
> hike in officers from previous border assignments. A separate memo
> from a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) supervisor to agency
> field operation managers says the “can-do approach by your folks
> in supporting this important mission is recognized and
> appreciated.” No mention of how it will compromise the
> “important mission” of protecting the flying public, especially
> during peak summer travel.
>
> FAM operates under the beleaguered Transportation Security
> Administration (TSA), which was created after 9/11 to prevent
> another terrorist attack. Air marshals are charged with protecting
> commercial passenger flights by deterring and countering the risk of
> terrorist activity and officers, specially trained aviation security
> specialists, are outraged that they are being sent to the southern
> border again. Back in October Judicial Watch reported
>
[[link removed]]
on the
> first deployment of FAM to the Mexican border to assist with “a
> surge in irregular migration.” Officers were pulled from their
> critical duty of protecting commercial planes flagged for terrorist
> threats to conduct hospital watch, entry control, welfare checks and
> transportation services for migrants. A few months later, under
> pressure from the Air Marshal National Council, the Biden
> administration stopped sending FAM
>
[[link removed]]
> to the Mexican border, a reckless practice that left aircraft at
> risk by taking away 150-200 agents monthly, according to DHS
> sources.
>
> The controversial program’s reinstatement could not come at a
> worse time, on the heels of credible terrorist threats as airports
> get busier for summer travel. Al Qaeda recently announced it is
> planning attacks in the U.S.
>
[[link removed]],
> possibly involving planes and using “new techniques and tactics”
> and FBI Director Christopher Wray has told Congress that both Al
> Qaeda and the Islamic State intend to carry out or inspire
> largescale attacks in the U.S. Even without the Mexican border
> assignments, the agency is spread thin, according to the Air Marshal
> National Council, which fired off a letter
>
[[link removed]]
> this week to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and TSA Director
> Tirrell Stevenson requesting the border missions stop immediately to
> thwart another 9/11. “FAMs barley cover 1% of flights as it stands
> today, and the current workforce is depleted with no clear path on
> hiring additional resources,” the letter states. Ordering FAM to
> the southern border will “make our homeland security even more
> vulnerable to attack,” and further deteriorate the morale of the
> workforce, the letter continues. Afterall, during their most recent
> stint along the Mexican border, the specialized law enforcement
> agents mostly made sandwiches for illegal immigrants, drove them
> around like Uber and picked up supplies, Hightower-LaBosco told
> Judicial Watch.

Until next week,



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%;height:auto;" alt="advertisement"></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2023, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis