CATEGORY: GOVERNMENT (8 MIN)
Last weekend, the United Kingdom crowned its new head of state, King Charles III. As is customary, commentators and protestors dutifully took to the internet and the street to bash the tradition. Their attacks carry a familiar message: what’s the point of an old, musty, hierarchical ritual in the 21st century?
Sohrab Ahmari, writing in UnHerd, launches a unique defense of the coronation. He argues that instead of lifting the king above his subjects, the coronation ceremony actually humbles the king to a vulnerable state.
Ahmari draws on research into African rituals to discover a core element of most cultures’ crowning formalities. Many of them force the new king or chief to suffer humiliation at the hands of his people in what Ahmari calls a “liminal,” in-between state before ascending. This humiliation makes the king stoop to the level of his subjects to humanize him.
In the same way, Ahmari says, the British coronation melds Christian tradition with this common theme. He believes that by anointing the monarch, the bishops in some ways associate the new leader with Christ’s sacrifice—the ultimate humiliation.
Read Ahmari’s thought-provoking work right here.
|