If and when pollution from a chemical plant makes its way into a nearby community, it becomes a serious threat to public health. The EPA has proposed new, stronger limits on these toxic emissions. Join us in urging the agency to finalize the strongest possible protections for our health.

John,

Once it's released, toxic air pollution from chemical plants doesn't respect property lines.

This pollution increases cancer risk for individuals and communities living nearby. And we have a chance right now to significantly reduce Americans' exposure to toxic chemical plant emissions.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering updating its emissions standards for these polluting facilities, and we're advocating to make sure the new rules are as strong as possible.1 Will you join this effort by submitting your public comment today?

The EPA's proposal would require chemical plants to report when and how much certain toxic substances they release end up crossing beyond their property lines.

And if a plant fails to keep its pollution below the established limit? It must fix the problem or risk legal action. In particular, affected citizens would be able to sue to reduce the threat.

That could be a game-changer for communities such as one in Louisiana where an elementary school sits a half-mile from a plant that emits chloroprene, which the EPA considers a likely carcinogen.2,3

In total, the proposal would cover around 200 chemical plants and eliminate an estimated 6,000 pounds of toxic air pollution annually.4 That includes reducing pollution from another chemical called ethylene oxide, commonly used in medical sterilization plants, by as much as two-thirds below 2020 levels. Long-term exposure to ethylene oxide can increase the risk of lymphoma and breast cancer.5

We can't miss this opportunity to address these serious health threats. But industry groups such as the American Chemistry Council are already trying to weaken the EPA's proposal -- which is why citizen advocates like you and me need to step up, John.6

The more of us that raise our voices and urge the EPA to do the right thing, the better the chances are that the final standards will be as strong as possible. Submit your comment before the EPA's June 26 deadline.

Thank you,

Faye Park
President


1. Michael Phillis, "EPA proposal takes on health risks near US chemical plants," AP News, April 6, 2023.
2. Michael Phillis, "EPA proposal takes on health risks near US chemical plants," AP News, April 6, 2023.
3. "LaPlace, Louisiana -- Frequent Questions: What is Chloroprene?," Environmental Protection Agency, last accessed April 26, 2023.
4. "Proposal to Strengthen Standards for Synthetic Organic Chemical Plants and Polymers and Resins Plants," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, last accessed April 21, 2023.
5. Michael Phillis, "EPA proposal takes on health risks near US chemical plants," AP News, April 6, 2023.
6. Michael Phillis, "EPA proposal takes on health risks near US chemical plants," AP News, April 6, 2023.


Support U.S. PIRG. Contributions by people just like you make our advocacy possible. Your contribution supports a staff of organizers, attorneys, scientists and other professionals who monitor government and corporate decisions and advocate on the public's behalf.

Join us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter

U.S. PIRG, Main Office: 1543 Wazee St., Suite 460, Denver, CO 80202, (303) 801-0582
Federal Advocacy Office: 600 Pennsylvania Ave. SE, 4th Fl., Washington, DC 20003, (202) 546-9707
Member Questions or Requests: 1-800-838-6554.

If you want us to stop sending you email then follow this link -- unsubscribe.

202-683-7268