** Entergy New Orleans made misleading claims that ROE cut meant financial disaster ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Daniel Tait on Feb 03, 2020 02:27 pm
When the New Orleans City Council threatened to cut Entergy New Orleans’ high profit margins last year, the utility company responded aggressively: it said that such a move would not only be illegal, but also would be “an untenable proposition for any investor.” ([link removed]) That lack of investment would make it impossible for Entergy to “make the investments in the future of New Orleans,” ([link removed]) the monopoly utility said.

But Entergy’s own financial filings and reactions from Wall Street analysts indicate that the utility’s claims may have been self-serving bluffs.


** Profit cut set off fight between Entergy and City Council
------------------------------------------------------------

Up through last year, Entergy New Orleans’ return on equity (ROE), a measure of profitability, was 11.1% ([link removed]) , one of the highest in the Southeast region ([link removed]) . ROE measures the percentage that a utility is allowed by regulators to collect in profits on the capital investments it spends on infrastructure.

The City of New Orleans, which regulates Entergy New Orleans, voted ([link removed]) to reduce Entergy New Orleans’s ROE to 9.35% on November 7, 2019. The City Council also fined Entergy $1 million in the same meeting for “inaction and omissions” ([link removed]) as a penalty for the unabated power outages plaguing the city.

Entergy had warned ([link removed]) that an ROE cut below 10% would result in “lengthy and costly litigation” ([link removed]) since it would be “arbitrary and not supported by law ([link removed]) .” A last-ditch effort ([link removed]) by Entergy to smear ([link removed]) clean energy intervenors and scare the Council into voting against the proposed reduction in profit failed; City Council President Helena Moreno called Entergy’s bluff and accused the utility of “bullying and threats,”
([link removed]) in a sharply worded letter to Entergy New Orleans CEO David Ellis.

Entergy sued ([link removed]) the City of New Orleans in response on December 6, 2019, seeking to overturn the Council’s ROE cut.

Entergy New Orleans’ claims notwithstanding, a 9.35% ROE is not outside the spectrum of what other utilities are allowed by regulators to earn. Dominion Energy’s Virginia utility requested to increase its ROE from 9.2% to 10.75%, but regulators rejected the request in November 2019. Virginia regulators found the 9.2% ROE was “consistent with the public interest” and “reasonably balances the interests” of Dominion, customers, and investors. Electric utilities filed 54 new rate reviews in 2018, according to a review by the Edison Electric Institute, the trade association and lobbying group for electric utilities. The review found that, “average awarded return on equity (ROE) was 9.51% ([link removed]) , the lowest annual average in our 30 years of data.”

In its briefings to a Louisiana court, Entergy said ([link removed]) that without permanent relief from the recent City Council decision, the company would “suffer irreparable harm”. Entergy estimated the cumulative effect of New Orleans City Council’s decision would cost the company $25 million per year.

Even if Entergy New Orleans’ estimate is correct, it would equate to less than three percent of the parent company Entergy’s net income in 2018, which was $863 million ([link removed]) , according to the company’s Integrated Report.


** Wall Street seems unconcerned, some see renewables as potential profit driver
------------------------------------------------------------

Wall Street seems to have shrugged off Entergy’s claims of impending financial disaster from the ROE cut. Entergy’s share price has risen from $116 on Nov. 6, the day before the City Council cut the New Orleans’ subsidiary’s ROE, to $132 on Jan. 31, broadly tracking other utilities. Some analysts have been bullish on Entergy’s long-term outlook, noting the company’s coal-heavy fleet leaves ample opportunity for renewable energy development to increase Entergy’s deployed capital while saving customers money.

Big Cajun 2, an unscrubbed coal plant in which Entergy is a part owner, presents a case study lending evidence to that theory from investors. The coal plant registered ([link removed]) $137 million in three-year cumulative market losses according to an analysis from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Entergy ratepayers soaked up those losses.

Financial analysts at Morgan Stanley and Moody’s Investors Service released ([link removed]) reports in December 2019 announcing their expectation that more electric utilities will accelerate their transition away from coal, with major financial benefits for both ratepayers and shareholders. Morgan Stanley reported that replacing coal specifically with lower-cost renewable energy could save electricity customers as much as $8 billion each year nationwide. Analysts posed questions that seemed to point in that direction on Entergy’s 2019 third-quarter earnings call, with one asking if Entergy might pursue more wind energy development.

But Entergy seems to be pursuing an approach that’s at least as reliant on investment in new gas-fired power as renewable energy. On Entergy’s 2019 third-quarter earnings call, CEO Leo Denault signaled ([link removed]) a large gas buildout of up to 4 gigawatts was in the works. Denault said, “We still see the need to replace the significant amount of our aging generation and that a portion of that will be gas, a portion of that could be renewables. We outlined a 7,000 to 8,000-megawatt need and a roughly 50-50 gas to renewables standpoint there.”

The post Entergy New Orleans made misleading claims that ROE cut meant financial disaster ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]




** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Southwest Gas was top contributor to Arizona legislators sponsoring gas utility bill ([link removed])
** Arizona Public Service announces 100% clean energy goal, saying it will “eliminate all fossil fuels” ([link removed])
** TVA’s Latest Long-Term Partnership Contract Cedes No Ground to Local Power Companies ([link removed])
** Energy Choice Falls Flat at Florida Supreme Court After Utility Offensive ([link removed])
** Growing number of elected Democrats in Arizona won’t take money from APS ([link removed]

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.

Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]