Incremental changes toward large outcomes



<[link removed]>



Hi Friend,



Oh, Congress. They can’t seem to agree on anything, even when the stakes are
this high. Take this week’s all too familiar partisan stalemate surrounding the
debt ceiling. Both sides have their approach, but ultimately there was little
in the way of compromise. The debt ceiling was eventually raised, avoiding a
crisis, but it was done mostly along partisan lines (four Republicans voted for
it), but we’ll soon be back to do it all over again.



As always, though — just consider a world in which we don’t have to.



At a time when a near-record number of voters identify as independent, and the
overwhelming majority of Americans continue to be dissatisfied with Congress,
there’s no doubt that the country is frustrated with Washington’s inability to
do even the things we take for granted.



The path to avoiding even the threat of unforced errors — and ultimately to a
government that gets the challenging stuff, not just the token stuff, done — is
the path to electoral reform. Bear that in mind as you read through three other
things to consider this week …





Revamping the Race: A Guide to Overhauling the 2024 Presidential Primaries
<[link removed]>


Let's face it, the current primary voting system is like a bad road trip where
the majority ends up disappointed with the lunch spot. But with ranked choice
voting (RCV), we can finally make decisions that leave everyone satisfied.



A recent Newsweek article
<[link removed]>
presents the following scenario as a framework for understanding the merits of
this system in presidential primaries:



“Consider nine students on a road trip. They vote on where to have lunch: Four
want McDonald's, but the other five are vegetarians. They split their votes
between Sweetgreen and Panera Bread. If America's primary voting system were in
place, the nine students would be eating at McDonald's, disappointing five of
them (the majority). But, if they ranked their votes, the Panera and Sweetgreen
voters would combine on the second round, and the nine would eat in a
restaurant that the majority actually favored.”





<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>




Election Officials Urge Congress for $400M Funding to Improve U.S. Election
Security Ahead of 2024
<[link removed]>


A bipartisan group of more than three dozen election officials, former members
of Congress, Cabinet secretaries, and national security leaders have come
together to petition Congress for $400 million in additional U.S. election
security funds in advance of next year’s election. And they're not the only
ones worried about the issue: a recent poll from Issue One, conducted byCitizen
Data <[link removed]>, found that 70% of Americans, including 66% of
Republicans and 74% of Democrats, agree that the federal government should play
a larger role in ensuring our elections are properly funded.



With the ongoing threat of disinformation, cyber attacks, malignant finance
operations, and other targeted system disruptions threatening the legitimacy of
our elections, these officials are making it clear that increased funding is
crucial to ensure the security and integrity of our electoral process. As they
put it, "running an election is not an every two or four-year job" — it's a
seven-days-a-week responsibility that requires a concerted response from every
level of government.





<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>




Speaking of a near-record high of independents…
<[link removed]>


As hinted at the top, a recent poll from Gallup
<[link removed]> found 49 percent of
Americans identifying as independent has created some waves in political
circles during the last few weeks. The Dispatch’s Sarah Isgur (who talked to
our executive director Nick Troiano about electoral reform last year
<[link removed]>
) had this interesting and relevant take:

“[H]alf of American voters may no longer identify as R or D, but 84 percent of
congressional races were decided by more than 10 points,which means they were
decided in the partisan primary that these people feel no attachment to and in
some states would be barred from participating in. As a result, we’d expect the
two candidates in general elections to be less and less representative of their
constituents. As we discussed above, this will drive Congress further to the
extremes. But it also could alienate more people from voting at all. Except
we’ve seen the exact opposite in recent cycles—voter turnout in general
elections has been sky high. Why? Because that 49 percent may not want to
identify with either political party but they also believe that one of the two
“extremists” is an existential threat to their way of life. Yikes!”

(The article is behind a paywall.)
  


<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>
 



Regards,



Alana
__
Alana Persson
Unite America

DONATE <[link removed]>





Want to stop receiving our weekly Three Things Thursday emails? Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
from Three Things Thursday, orUnsubscribe
<[link removed]>
from all Unite America communications.

Unite America | 1580 Lincoln St Suite #520 Denver, CO 80203
Paid for by Unite America PAC INC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
www.uniteamerica.org <[link removed]>