We don't need no stinkin' statutory authority!
E&E News (4/20/23) reports: "Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan took aim Wednesday at the Defense Department's focus on climate change, calling the effort an 'obsession' and an 'unbelievable focus in the wrong area.' The ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support peppered Pentagon officials with questions about climate and energy — including asking Air Force and Army brass to commit to using fossil fuels on Alaska bases that face extreme cold. In particular, Sullivan chided Meredith Berger, the Navy’s assistant secretary for energy, installations and environment, for the department’s slow delivery of reports on shipbuilding and amphibious warships, even as it released its climate action plan last May. 'Is that a good prioritization of what the Navy stands for in our national defense?' he asked Berger. Berger said she had no oversight of the shipbuilding report. 'But where I do focus is the mission and the readiness of our soldiers and Marines,' she said, 'and so I do think that climate change needs to be a threat that we’re ready for.' In another exchange, Sullivan asked Berger to cite the statutory authority for the Navy to meet net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Berger responded, 'We have a goal. I don’t think there needs to be a statutory basis.' Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine (D), said he shared Sullivan’s frustration with the Navy’s slow delivery of reports, but he stressed the importance of the department’s climate efforts."
|
|
|
|
|
"America's affluent protesters can afford the higher prices. But poor people will suffer. Allowing billions of the world's poor to live a modern life requires energy from gas, oil, and even coal."
– John Stossel, Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|