[link removed]
**
** Schiff: GOP Rep. Jordan Going After DA Bragg ‘Unprecedented’
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Monday on MSNBC’s All In ([link removed]) , Rep. Adam Schiff ([link removed]) (D-CA) said Rep. Jim Jordan’s (R-OH) requests for testimony from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg ([link removed]) and his hearing in New York today were “unprecedented” because Congress had no jurisdiction in local prosecutions.
Schiff said, “Jim Jordan took the circus out on the road. It just shows what a political stunt it is, and there is no legislative purpose involved. They’re not only hurting their legal cause. But the really doing what they have done for years now, it’s trying to serve as Donald Trump’s criminal defense lawyers.”
Guest host Ayman Mohyeldin asked, “Can you explain why exactly the Judiciary Committee does not have oversight over a local district attorney like Alvin Bragg?”
Schiff said, “Absolutely and I served as a federal prosecutor for almost six years. This is unprecedented. You never have a situation where the Congress of the United States decides that a local prosecutor is engaged in a case that Congress does not like so therefore Congress is going to investigate the prosecutor. That never happens because there is sets separation of powers and responsibilities. Local authorities have the power to enforce local and state laws and the Congress has no jurisdiction. They have no power to interfere with that.”
Schiff is an inveterate liar and propagandist. His job is to make media appearances in which he deflects from the truth and crafts false narratives for the complicit mainstream media like MSNBC.
triangle.png
**
** Adam Schiff
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
27 Known Connections
[link removed]
** Schiff Lies Repeatedly to Promote the Trump-Russia “Collusion” Hoax
------------------------------------------------------------
In early February 2017, Schiff tried to promote ([link removed]) the narrative that former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, prior to Trump’s inauguration, may have violated the Logan Act ([link removed]) by seeking, during a phone call with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, to undercut then-President Obama’s existing sanctions against Russia. In its February 14, 2017 issue, The Atlantic magazine quoted Schiff saying: “Trump’s team, through Flynn, reaches out to the Russian ambassador and potentially says, ‘Don’t worry about those sanctions. We’re going to take care of business. We’re not going to bite the hand that fed us.’ That’s something that needs to be investigated. That’s hugely consequential.” But as investigative reporter John Solomon subsequently noted ([link removed]
e-biggest-loser-russia-probe) :
“By the time Schiff uttered those words, the FBI agent who had investigated Flynn’s contacts with Russia had already concluded on Jan. 4, 2017 that there was ‘no derogatory information’ about Flynn’s contacts and recommended closing down the case, according to recently declassified FBI memos. And … the FBI had informed DOJ by late January 2017 that Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia. Likewise, the main prosecutor for national security cases inside the Justice Department, Mary McCord, and others thought prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act was unlikely or a ‘long shot’ after reading Flynn’s actual words from a transcript of his conversation with the Russian ambassador [which had been secretly recorded by U.S. intelligence agents]…. And a top FBI official’s handwritten notes expressed concern the bureau’s treatment of Flynn amounted to ‘playing games’ and appeared to involve an effort to get him into an interview where he might [lie] so he could prosecuted or fired.”
In a March 22, 2017 interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, Schiff claimed ([link removed]) there was “more than circumstantial evidence” that Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign had colluded with Russian government operatives to tilt the election in his favor. When Todd asked Schiff if he had “seen direct evidence of collusion,” the congressman replied: “I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation, so that is what we ought to do.” From that point forward, Schiff established himself as one of the Democrat Party’s leading voices demanding Trump’s impeachment, repeatedly proclaiming falsely to the media that the evidence against the president was overwhelming...
To learn more about Adam Schiff, click on his profile link above.
------------------------------------------------------------
** Search our constantly growing database of the left and its Agendas
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Discover the Networks is the only resource of its kind
We need your support.
------------------------------------------------------------
Donate Now ([link removed])
[link removed]
** A project of the
David Horowitz Freedom Center
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed] [link removed]
© Copyright 2019, Discover the Newtworks
Unsubscribe ([link removed])
