Judicial Watch Sues On Biden Burisma Scandal

[WEEKLY UPDATE]

HAS THE IMPEACHMENT CIRCUS REACHED ITS FINAL ACT?

[[link removed]]


Will the nation learn anything from the spectacle of the Pelosi-Schiff
coup cabal abusing the Constitution with their impeachment circus? As
with the Judge Kavanaugh lynching, the impeachment of President Trump
was always a house of cards built on abuse of power, distortions and
dastardly lies.

The fact that the president has had to expend so many resources is
terrible for the country. Schiff should never have been allowed to get
a Senate trial. And every minute of every day wasted on this is a
distraction from dealing with the issues we ought to be dealing with
– like putting people who illegally spied on the President in jail
or the Coronavirus emergency.

I discussed this with Lou Dobbs, and you can watch the interview here
[[link removed]].
Meantime, we are in court with dozens
of lawsuits to uncover the terrible corruption behind the illegal
spying and abuse targeting President Trump and our constitutional
republic.

(Thanks to our friends at the _Daily Caller_
[[link removed]],
Judicial Watch is providing a feed of the
trail so you can watch the proceedings directly. The live feed is
available here
[[link removed]],
here
[[link removed]],
here
[[link removed]],
and here
[[link removed]].)

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES ON THE BIDEN-BURISMA SCANDAL AND THE SO-CALLED
‘WHISTLEBLOWER’

We just filed two Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against
the Department of State relating to Burisma Holdings. The first seeks
records of communications from the U.S. embassy in Kyiv related to
Burisma. The second seeks records related to a January 19, 2016,
meeting at the White House that included Ukrainian prosecutors,
embassy officials and CIA employee Eric Ciaramella (_Judicial Watch v.
U.S. Department of State_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:20-cv-000229)) and (_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State
[[link removed]
(No. 1:20-cv-000239)).

Ciaramella reportedly worked on Ukraine issues while on detail to both
the Obama and Trump White Houses. He is widely reported
[[link removed]]
as the person who filed the whistleblower complaint that triggered the
impeachment proceedings. His name reportedly was “raised privately
in impeachment depositions, according to officials with direct
knowledge of the proceedings, as well as in at least one open hearing
held by a House committee not involved in the impeachment inquiry.”

Last month we sued
[[link removed]]
for Ciaramella’s CIA emails and for information on his links to the
FBI/DOJ Russiagate investigation. We also sued for records
[[link removed]]
about the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor after then-Vice
President Joe Biden threatened to withhold aid.

The Senate, through Chief Justice Roberts, has effectively banned
mention of Ciaramella’s name during the Trump impeachment trial, but
the politics of cover-up won’t stop Judicial Watch.

We filed the new suits after the State Department failed to respond to
FOIA requests for:

• All cables/teletypes or e-mails sent or addressed to any official,
employee, or representative of the Department of State stationed at
the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv containing the term “Burisma.”
• All records regarding the January 19, 2016, meeting at the White
House that included State Department Ukrainian Resident Legal Advisor
Jeff Cole and U.S. Embassy Kyiv employee Svitlana Pardus.
• All records of communication between State Department Resident
Legal Advisor Jeff Cole and National Security Council staffer Eric
Ciaramella.
• All records of communication between U.S. Embassy Kyiv employee
Svitlana Pardus and National Security Council staffer Eric Ciaramella.

• All emails sent by or addressed to State Department Resident Legal
Advisor Jeff Cole and/or U.S. Embassy Kyiv employee Svitlana Pardus
between January 10, 2016 and January 30, 2016.

In April 2014, Hunter Biden joined the board
[[link removed]]
of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings. He served on the board
until early 2019. Burisma, which was under investigation by the
Ukrainian government stated at the time of his hiring
[[link removed]]
that Biden would, be “in charge of the Holdings’ legal unit and
will provide support for the Company among international
organizations.” Biden had no previous energy experience.

In November 2019, through analysis of Obama-era White House visitor
logs, we broke the story
[[link removed]]
of Ciaramella’s White House meetings. Ciaramella was detailed to the
Obama White House in 2015 and returned to the CIA during the Trump
administration in 2017. The list of persons Ciaramella met with
includes, but is not limited to, Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and
executive director of the Soros-funded Anticorruption Action Center
(AntAC) in Ukraine; Gina Lentine, formerly the Eurasia program
coordinator at Soros funded Open Society Foundations; and former
Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who had extensive
involvement with Clinton-funded dossier
[[link removed]].
The logs also reveal that that Alexandra Chalupa
[[link removed]],
a contractor hired by the DNC during the 2016 election who coordinated
with Ukrainians to investigate President Trump and his former campaign
manager Paul Manafort, visited the White House 27 times.

On January 22, 2020, Fox News’ Laura Ingraham reported
[[link removed]]
that New York Times journalist Ken Vogel was investigating the January
19, 2016, meeting at the White House. Vogel had contacted the State
Department via email for comment, specifically mentioning concerns
about Hunter Biden’s position with Burisma:

> “We are going to report that [State Department official] Elizabeth
> Zentos attended a meeting at the White House on 1/19/2016 with
> Ukrainian prosecutors and embassy officials as well as …
> [redacted] from the NSC … The subjects discussed included efforts
> within the United State government to support prosecutions, in
> Ukraine and the United Kingdom, of Burisma Holdings … and concerns
> that Hunter Biden’s position with the company could complicate
> such efforts.”

Our new lawsuits could confirm that President Trump had every right to
be concerned about Ukraine and Biden corruption – and that the
impeachment against him was a shameful attempt to cover up these
scandals.

ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS ‘BLOWN AWAY’ BY CLINTON’S ‘FABULOUS
PARTY’

We have consistently reported the chummy relationship between
President Obama’s Justice Department and Hillary Clinton.

Now we have more evidence in seven pages
[[link removed]]
of heavily redacted emails from the Department of Justice relating to
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alana Robinson and Emily W. Allen, who
attended an August 2015 fundraiser in California for then-presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton.

The two San Diego-based prosecutors played a leading role in
prosecuting former Congressman Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA) and Hunter’s
wife on 60 separate criminal charges relating to the misuse of
campaign funds. Hunter pled guilty to one count of criminal conspiracy
on December 3, 2019, and resigned from Congress on January 7, 2020. He
is scheduled to be sentenced on March 17, 2020.

In June 2019, Hunter filed a motion
[[link removed]]
seeking to dismiss the charges against him or, in the alternative,
recuse the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Diego on the grounds that
Robinson and Allen had a political conflict of interest due to their
attendance at the Clinton fundraiser.

In response
[[link removed]],
the prosecutors represented to the San Diego federal court where the
criminal case is pending that Robinson and Allen were asked to attend
the Clinton fundraiser “in the event of a protective security
related incident where immediate prosecutorial guidance would be
necessary.” The statement did not elaborate on what kind of incident
might require prosecutorial guidance. An earlier letter from Executive
Office for United States Attorneys General Counsel Jay Macklin
represented that the prosecutors were at the event “in their
official capacity assisting law enforcement.”

The new records, obtained in response to a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) lawsuit (_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:19-cv-03578)), raise serious questions about these responses
and whether prosecutors misled the court.

In an email
[[link removed]]
obtained through the lawsuit, sent on the date of the Clinton
fundraiser, August 7, 2016, with the subject line “Photo,” a U.S.
Attorney’s office official, whose name is redacted, sends a note to
another U.S. Attorney’s office official, whose name is also redacted
saying, “Thank you so much for the invitation to this morning’s
event! I was blown away by your incredible hospitality and can’t
thank you enough for allowing us to crash that fabulous party. It was
a really memorable morning.”

In another email
[[link removed]]
on the same date and with the same subject line, one U.S. Attorney’s
office official, whose name is redacted, sends a note to another
official, whose name is also redacted saying, “[Y]ou totally
downplayed that amazing invitation! I had no idea it would be so
spectacular. I didn’t even realize we’d be invited in! I am so
grateful for the invitation, thank you.”

Robinson and Allen, both registered Democrats, took photos with
Clinton at the fundraiser, held at the home of Qualcomm co-founder
Irwin Jacobs and his wife, Joan. Within months of the fundraiser,
Hunter became the first sitting member of Congress to publicly endorse
Clinton’s opponent in the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump.
Robinson became acting U.S. Attorney in January 2017, and her office
commenced its investigation of Hunter and his wife the following
month.

The Hatch Act generally prohibits federal employees from participating
in political activities while on duty, and Department of Justice
regulations impose further restrictions on prosecutors. Rules of
professional conduct prohibit attorneys from knowingly making false
statements of material fact to a tribunal or failing to correct such
statements. They also require truthfulness in statements to others.

These emails are yet more evidence of potential political bias at the
Justice Department. Thorough investigations by the Office of Special
Counsel, DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility, and other
competent authorities are necessary to get to the bottom of this and
the great many other recurring instances of seeming political bias at
Justice.

U.S. FUNDING OF ISLAMIST ‘CHARITY’ GROUPS TRIPLES UNDER TRUMP

Why would the Trump administration be giving more taxpayer dollars to
radical Islamist organizations than the Obama administration? Our
_Corruption Chronicles_ blog has the alarming details
[[link removed]


> The amount of American taxpayer dollars that go to Islamist
> organizations has drastically increased under the Trump
> administration, which has doled out millions to radical nonprofits,
> including a recent allocation to a terrorist front group named as an
> unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism financing trial.

> Between 2017 and 2018 the U.S. government more than tripled its
> funding to organizations either influenced or controlled by Islamist
> activists from $4 million to $13.5 million
>
[[link removed]],
> according to an analysis conducted by a think tank dedicated to
> protecting Western values from Middle Eastern threats.

> The Philadelphia-based nonprofit, Middle East Forum (MEF), reviewed
> millions of dollars in government grant data and found that the
> Trump administration is dedicating a lot more to radical Muslim
> groups than the Obama administration, which gave Islamist-linked
> organizations an average of $1.7 million annually. A big chunk of
> the money, around $8.7 million, has gone to the Islamic Circle of
> North America (ICNA), a surrogate of the south Asian paramilitary
> group Jamaat-e-Islami, which was recently banned by the Indian
> government under anti-terrorism laws. An ICNA subsidiary known as
> Helping Hand for Relief and Development has openly partnered with
> the Pakistani terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, which was involved
> in the 2008 Mumbai terror attack that killed 164 people. The $8.7
> million was delivered in 2018 for “disaster assistance
> projects,” according to the government data obtained by MEF.

> Other radical groups whose coffers have been filled by the Trump
> administration include Islamic Relief ($800,000), which is closely
> tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and has been designated as a
> terror-financing organization by Israel and the United Arab
> Emirates; the Islamic Institute of Knowledge, which is linked to the
> Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, has
> received $780,000 from the U.S; the Muslim American Society,
> identified by MEF as the Muslim Brotherhood’s leading activist
> organization in the U.S., got $160,000 from Uncle Sam. The group’s
> Philadelphia branch recently broadcast
>
[[link removed]]
a
> disturbing video of kids at its center singing about chopping off
> the heads of Jews. Dar al-Hijrah, an extremist mosque in Virginia
> that the U.S. government says operates as a front for Hamas,
> received $100,000. Al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Aulaqi
>
[[link removed]]
> was the imam at the Falls Church mosque and two of the 9/11
> hijackers attended his sermons as well as Nidal Hassan, the Ft. Hood
> terrorist sentenced to death for murdering 13 and wounding dozens of
> others at a Texas Army base.

> Just a few months ago, another $100,000 went to the Council on
> American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) via a Department of Homeland
> Security (DHS) grant program. CAIR is a terrorist front group that
> was named as a co-conspirator
>
[[link removed]]
in
> a federal terror-finance case involving the Hamas front group Holy
> Land Foundation. For more details read a Judicial Watch special
> report
>
[[link removed]]
on
> Muslim charities. CAIR was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern
> extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the
> American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic
> Association for Palestine. The Obama administration allowed CAIR to
> transform the way U.S. law enforcement agencies conduct
> anti-terrorism training by permitting the group to bully agencies at
> the local, state and federal level to alter materials determined to
> be discriminatory against Muslims. This includes getting the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to purge anti-terrorism training
> curricula of material coined “offensive” to Muslims. Judicial
> Watch uncovered that scandal, obtained the FBI records
>
[[link removed]]
and
> published an in-depth report
>
[[link removed]].
CAIR
> also got several local police departments and the U.S. military
> to eliminate
>
[[link removed]]
anti-terrorism
> training materials and instructors deemed anti-Muslim.

> The Trump administration seems to have maintained a cozy
> relationship with CAIR, recently joining forces with the group by
> suing
>
[[link removed]]
> a Michigan suburb for rejecting a Muslim organization’s zoning
> request to construct a mosque within city limits.
>

NEW YORK CITY MAYOR DE BLASIO’S SUSPECT CRIME STATISTICS

The Left has undertaken a massive, national effort to weaken our
criminal justice system. This has resulted in rising crime and reduced
public safety. Our chief investigative reporter, Micah Morrison, has
the latest
[[link removed]]
for Judicial Watch’s _Investigative Bulletin_:

> Mayor Bill de Blasio tells anyone who will listen that New York is
> “the safest big city in America
>
[[link removed]
> And for a long time, that appeared to be true. But signs of rising
> urban disorder
>
[[link removed]]
> lately have been sending a different message. And increasingly, the
> mayor’s own safe-city crime statistics seem suspect.

> De Blasio stakes his safe-city claim on CompStat
>
[[link removed]],
> the NYPD’s vaunted policing technology. CompStat is the computer
> age meets crime fighting: a high-tech, data-driven approach to
> gathering statistics and deploying resources to drive down crime.
> The CompStat approach has been adopted by cities around the country
> and abroad—so trouble with the system could have national and even
> international implications.

> In New York, doubts about CompStat
>
[[link removed]]
> have been rising. For years, journalists have heard rumors of
> trouble: that the mayor’s office wields too much control over
> shaping the data; that precinct commanders under-report incidents to
> keep their numbers down; that patrol cops are encouraged not to
> report certain crimes; that the stats are rigged.

> The spin around the most recent CompStat numbers is a case in point.
> “New York City recorded an increase in murders, shootings,
> robberies and assaults in 2019,” the Wall Street Journal reported
>
[[link removed]].

> Domestic violence
>
[[link removed]]
> is up, with last year’s 8% increase in murders due in part to
> intimate-partner homicides. Hate crimes, including anti-Semitism,
> are up. CompStat has not even counted them
>
[[link removed]]
> until this year. Subway crime
>
[[link removed]]
> is up. But City Hall says that because of a big decrease in
> burglaries, and declines in rapes and larceny, “serious crime”
> in New York City is down, dropping one percent last year.

> Got that? Murders, shootings, robberies, assaults, domestic
> violence, subway crimes and hate crimes are up, but serious crime is
> down.

> Mark Twain famously noted there are “lies, damned lies, and
> statistics.” It’s time for an independent review to sort out
> which it is at CompStat.

Until next week …



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img alt="WU01"
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%; height:auto;" /></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2020, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]