If a campaign consultant has a track record of losing races, then a candidate should know that. And if the consultant wins, they should know that too.
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
Why a Grading Scale for Political Campaign Consultants, to Include Online Reviews and Star Ratings, Can Help Candidates Start Winning Again ([link removed])
[link removed]
(Source: Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images)
In nationwide surveys, 95 percent ([link removed]) of consumers read reviews before making a purchase, and 58 percent said they’d be willing to pay more money if a brand or service had good reviews.
Consumers also trust reviews just as much as personal recommendations – demonstrating the power and influence of online reviews in today’s marketplace.
The surveys also included some interesting data points.
[link removed]
For example, 72 percent of consumers depend on Google reviews when looking for businesses; star ratings matter more to consumers than the number of reviews; and 94 percent of consumers have avoided a business or service altogether because of a bad review.
Good reviews reward good products and services, while bad reviews result in a decline in sales or services.
[link removed]
(Source: Statista)
So if the average consumer relies on reviews as part of their daily decision-making process, then why not create a platform for star ratings and reviews of local and statewide campaign consultants – allowing candidates the chance to review consultants before making a decision to hire them on their campaign?
Far too often, candidates – especially first-time candidates are deceived into hiring campaign consultants who care more about how they can make money from their campaigns, then actually creating a winning campaign strategy.
Campaign consultants find interesting ways to make money off of campaigns and candidates, by persuading a candidate to only use their vendors for mailers, printing, literature, walk cards, signs, television and radio spots and website development – and taking a “referral fee” on the backend.
Campaign consultants can also come with their own donor list or voter data, negotiating with campaigns an additional fee structure that pays the consultants a certain percentage of all money raised from their own fundraising lists, or from the data that they collect and provide.
For candidates, all of this can be overwhelming – and it’s why a rating system with reviews would be incredibly helpful.
It’s also important for candidates to know what other campaigns the
consultants ([link removed]) worked on, and did those campaigns win or lose?
If a campaign consultant has a track record of losing races, then a candidate should know that. And if a campaign consultant has a track record of winning races — they should know that too.
By creating transparency and accountability – with realtime information, ratings and reviews, candidates will have the opportunity to make informed decisions – just like consumers do before buying a product or service – or in this case, investing in a campaign consultant.
And if this happens, candidates will be in a much better position to win by filling their team with consultants that bring with them a track record of winning.
If every day businesses are subjected to rating systems and reviews, then why not campaign consultants too?
Illinois Review is contemplating developing a grading system and invites people to confidentially share their consultant experiences with us at
[email protected] (mailto:
[email protected]?subject=Confidential%20-%20Consultant%20Review) .
[link removed]
A number of legal challenges have already been dismissed. Those that remain haven't gained significant traction. (Source: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Di Leo: The One Issue that Cannot Even Be Discussed ([link removed])
It’s been two and a half years, and soon the 2024 presidential primary season will be upon us, so it’s worth revisiting. Not all the details, just the big picture, and just a couple of very big numbers.
Over the past two and a half years, the Left has constantly reminded us that the courts threw out a number of 2020 election challenges (usually without even taking a look at the evidence presented), and that the various people involved in filing the challenges have given up and withdrawn their charges after seeing the overwhelming forces marshalled against them.
But none of that changes one basic, fundamental fact.
CLICK TO READ MORE ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
Illinois Family Institute: No Common Sense ([link removed])
Schools throughout Illinois have implemented rules that require students to be allowed to use the restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity, but it is not clear exactly how many. So a trans boy, who is really a girl, is allowed to use the boys’ restroom and locker room. While a trans girl, who is really a boy, is allowed to use the girls’ facilities. The requirement is based on a guidance document from the Illinois State Board of Education. CLICK TO READ MORE ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
Illinois State Rifle Association: Thursday Bulletin ([link removed])
The 2024 Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago. The Midwest will be a battleground in 2024. The Republican 2024 National Convention will be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. I remember the 1968 Democratic National Convention. Brace yourself. CLICK TO READ MORE ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
============================================================
To learn more about Illinois Review, visit ** www.illinoisreview.com ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Email (mailto:
[email protected])
ILLINOIS REVIEW
Mark A. Vargas, Editor-in-Chief
Scott R. Kaspar, Publisher
Our mailing address is:
P.O. Box 2783, Orland Park, IL 60462
Copyright © 2023 IR Media Corp., all rights reserved.
ILLINOIS REVIEW and the IR design are trademarks of IR Media Corp.
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can
** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.