We are less than a week away from the scheduled start of Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion trial against Fox News about the 2020 presidential election. But more news is being made ahead of the trial.
Tuesday was a big day as the judge in the case ruled on several pretrial motions. The day then ended with the judge scolding Fox’s legal team.
One of the notable rulings was Dominion cannot mention the Jan. 6 insurrection as a part of its case. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis said bringing up Jan. 6 would be prejudicial and that this case has nothing to do with whether or not Fox News “influenced” the events of Jan. 6.
Davis said, “To say somehow that Fox influenced that, I’m not deciding that part. We’re not putting the Jan. 6 attack on (trial). That may be for another court at another time. It’s not for this one.”
That ruling went in favor of Fox News, but the judge also ruled in favor of Dominion on other motions. He said Dominion can ask witnesses about Fox News’ strategy after the insurrection. As an example, after Jan. 6, Rupert Murdoch, chair of Fox Corp., the parent company of Fox News, mentioned in an email that Fox was “pivoting as far as possible.” Dominion is allowed to ask about that and other post-Jan. 6 strategies.
Dominion’s lawsuit claims that Fox News knowingly pushed false conspiracy theories about Dominion following the 2020 election and did so to keep from losing viewers. Fox News has claimed all along that it merely was covering what former President Donald Trump and his close advisers were saying about the 2020 election.
In a win for Dominion on Tuesday, Davis ruled that Fox News may not bring up newscasts in which Fox News’ on-air personalities fact-checked Trump and his supporters over election lies. Davis said those moments “were not relevant,” adding, “you can’t absolve yourself of defamation by putting someone else on at a different time.”
Davis also ruled that Dominion may bring up Fox News’ financial information, including salaries of top executives and talent. He said, “Economics are relevant.”
CNN’s Marshall Cohen, who is in Wilmington, Delaware, for the trial, wrote, “But Davis warned the network’s lawyers not to undercut or circumvent his rulings during their opening statements to the jury, when the high-stakes defamation trial kicks off next week. Davis issued the warning to both sides but zeroed in on Fox News. If Fox invokes legal defenses that Davis previously ruled were inadmissible, then ‘I will stop you and I will tell the jury that what you just said is incorrect’ and to ‘disregard what you just said,’ Davis said.”
In addition, it’s not totally shocking but it is troubling to hear that Davis said he has received death threats. He told attorneys for both sides, “I’ve sent you things that I’ve received.” Dominion employees also have been the target of threats.
That was part of a discussion when Dominion asked if they would bring up those threats at trial. Davis said they could say that the threats exist, but not give specifics because Fox can’t control what others may say.
“I’m not downplaying it,” Davis said. “You need to take every threat seriously. I take every threat seriously.”
Cohen wrote, “Dominion has argued that many of the threats were inspired by Fox, which the network denies. If Dominion wins, it wants Fox to pay for the beefed-up security measures that it implemented after 2020. A court spokesperson declined to comment about the threats against Davis.”
Meanwhile, at the end of the day, more drama. Dominion’s attorneys argued that Fox News misled them about Murdoch’s role with the company. They said they were led to believe that Murdoch only had a title at Fox News’ parent company, but not Fox News itself. But it turns out that Murdoch also holds a title at Fox News.
Dominion attorney Justin Nelson argued before the court, “This alone has meant that we are missing a whole bunch of Rupert Murdoch documents that we otherwise would have been entitled to. It’s very troubling that this is where we are. It’s something that has really affected how we have litigated this case.”
The judge then scolded Fox’s attorneys, telling them that they have a “credibility problem.” Fox attorneys argued that Murdoch’s title at Fox News is more of an “honorific title.”
Davis said, “I hope you’re not being cagey with me.”
Davis also said, “My problem is that it’s been represented more than once to me that he’s not an officer of Fox News. I need to feel comfortable that when you represent something to me, it’s the truth. I’m not very happy right now. I don’t know why this is such a difficult thing.”
In a statement, a spokesperson for Fox News said, “Rupert Murdoch has been listed as executive chairman of FOX News in our SEC filings since 2019 and this filing was referenced by Dominion’s own attorney during his deposition.”
Before the hearing was over, the judge mentioned it again, telling a Fox lawyer, “I’m not mad at you. I’m mad at the situation I’m in. So, I have to figure out how I deal with that.”
The trial is set to start next Monday.