How higher education has traded quality and credible research for junk
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
Selling Out
How higher education has traded quality and credible research for junk
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Academic Research/Citations;
Reading Time: ~4 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Articles - How Junk Citations Have Discredited the Academy ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Readers and researchers be warned. Higher education has traded quality research and credible sources for “citation justice” and woke ideology. Bruce Gilley, professor of political science at Portland State University, recently concluded an insightful series on “How Junk Citations Have Discredited the Academy ([link removed]) ,” published by Minding the Campus. His investigation into prevalent citation practices uncovered some startling revelations about the credibility (or lack thereof) of academic research and the rise of “junk citations.”
Before we jump down the dark rabbit hole of research and citations in higher education, you may be wondering, what exactly is a “junk citation”? Gilley states that a junk citation ([link removed]) “refers to a citation that is wrong, irrelevant, misleading, corrupt, uninformative, useless, or purely rhetorical.”
Sadly, many “scholarly sources” are chock full of junk citations. For example, Bruce Gilley’s article “The Case for Colonialism ([link removed]) ,” featured in the summer 2018 edition of Academic Questions, received backlash from critics who utilized sources rife with junk citations ([link removed]) —to which Gilley responded ([link removed]) . This is not an isolated incident—Gilley writes that “in a 2017 exposé ([link removed]) of bad citations in 472 articles in three peer-reviewed library science journals, Wilfrid Laurier University librarians Peter Genzinger and Deborah Wills found that 30% of the citations misrepresented the cited work, either wholly or in part.” Our 2018 report The Irreproducibility Crisis
of Modern Science ([link removed]) chronicles the downfall of credible scientific research, and the rise of sources that are used as “junk citations.” Many scientific results cannot be reproduced due to “arbitrary research techniques, lack of accountability, political groupthink,” and more.
It makes you wonder: how many more “quality sources” in collegiate research are riddled with junk citations or based entirely on bad research?
Over the course of his “Junk Citations” article series, Gilley gives several examples of how researchers are using such citations—and why. The popular new ways to use (and, dare I say, abuse) citations include “just trust me, this is what it says ([link removed]) ,” racially charged “citation justice ([link removed]) ,” and self-aggrandizing “citation-doping ([link removed]) .” The simplest solution to discouraging these practices may be to require authors to disclose where they find their sources. Gilley references ([link removed]) the fundamental rule given by Wayne Booth and colleagues in their book The Craft of Research
([link removed]) : “anytime we cite the work of others, we must tell the reader what research they did, what their findings were, and what, if anything, limits these findings’ relevance to the current argument. ‘Don’t accept a claim just because an authority asserts it.’” But perhaps this isn’t the best long-term solution to the problem.
Colleges and universities should expect more from their faculty, researchers, and students when it comes to citations and the pursuit of truth. I certainly hope that quality, scholarly work does not become a hallmark of days gone by.
We must take action to restore quality research standards in higher education. As Gilley states ([link removed]) , “Junk food leads to obesity, and junk citations lead to academic propaganda.” If left unchecked, junk citations will only exacerbate ideological bias, political division, and intellectual conformity in America’s colleges and universities.
But how can we rid ourselves of this academic plague? Gilley concludes his “Junk Citations” series with a simple solution: restore intellectual pluralism ([link removed]) . Lovers of quality research and progress would agree with Gilley—restoring healthy discourse, debate, and disagreement in higher education is the only way forward.
Until next week.
Kali Jerrard
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read the Articles ([link removed])
For more on Research in American higher education:
[link removed]
March 15, 2023
** Faculty Speech Varies Regionally ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Samuel J. Abrams
The ability to express diverse viewpoints without reputational and professional consequences has been under threat at colleges and universities for many years now.
[link removed]
August 16, 2022
** Peer-Reviewed History is Dying of Wokeness ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Randall
What is the state of academic history? The AHR’s bias is toward showcasing newer approaches and providing them with a stamp of approval. It isn’t a typical journal, but it tells you where the profession is going.
[link removed]
April 09, 2018
** Report: The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Randall and Christopher Welser
A reproducibility crisis afflicts a wide range of scientific and social-scientific disciplines, from epidemiology to social psychology. The report includes a series of policy recommendations, scientific and political, for alleviating the reproducibility crisis.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
