To view this newsletter online, click
here. To share it on Facebook, click here.
Dear Friend,
NEW POLL: Māori Party holds the balance of power 📊
Available exclusively to supporters like you, we can reveal the
results of our April Taxpayers' Union – Curia poll.
Labour is up one point to 37% and National is up two
points to 37%. ACT is up one point to 10% while the Greens are also up
one point to 7%.
The smaller parties were Māori Party 2.9% (+1.5
points), NZ First on 2.6% (-1.6 points), New Conservatives on 1.7%
(-0.8 points), Democracy NZ 1.6% (+1.1 points), and TOP on 0.8% (-0.9
points).
Here is how these results would translate to seats in Parliament,
assuming all electorate seats are held:
Both Labour and National are down one seat each to
48 and 47, respectively. ACT is also down one seat to 12 while the
Greens are up one on nine seats. The Māori Party is up two seats to
four.
The combined projected seats for the Centre-Right of 59
seats is down two on last month but remains marginally ahead of the
combined total for the Centre-Left of 57 seats (no change).
For the first time since August 2022, the
Centre-Right cannot form government on its own and neither bloc has a
majority. This means that the Māori Party holds the balance of
power.
Chris Hipkins has a net favourability of +28% (-5
points). Both Christopher Luxon (-4 points) and David Seymour are on
-6% (-7 points).
Finance Minister, Grant Robertson, has a net
favourability of -8% while Environment Minister, David Parker, has a
net favourability of -21%.
Chris Hipkins also now has a negative net favourability
rating with National voters of -5% down 18 points from +13% last
month.
Visit our website for more information and details of
how to get access to the full polling report.
Labour/National supermajority rams through Henry VIII power grab
with farce of a Parliamentary process ⚖️💥
You may not have heard about the
Government’s latest power-grab: It has hardly been covered in the
media, but it poses a significant threat to the rule of law and
democracy. The Government has seized the opportunity of the recent
cyclone devastation to grant its Ministers extensive powers, many of
which are unrelated to cyclone response or recovery and could remain
in place until 2028.
The Severe Weather Emergency
Recovery Act allows Ministers to sweep aside and rewrite a
whole laundry list of laws if they can point to even tentative
links to the recent weather events, economic development, or disaster
recovery. The 'emergency legislation' allows individual ministers to
ignore or change the Local Government Act, Resource Management Act,
Immigration Act, Land Transport Act (and others) without having to
even ask Parliament. What's worse is this 'emergency' regime applies
until 2028!
This kind of law is often referred to
as Henry VIII powers because it is similar to the autocratic lawmaking
style of Henry VIII who preferred to make laws by Royal Proclamation
rather than through Parliament.
"Shambles of a process" – just
20 hours for public submissions
Submitters on this new legislation were
given less than a day to write their submissions. Not even the most
experienced constitutional law experts were able to apply proper
scrutiny in this short timeframe and many important aspects will be
overlooked.
Our friends at the New Zealand
Initiative think tank have rightly criticised MPs for a
"shamblolic" process despite the extraordinary scope of the bill. You
can listen to the NZ Initiative's Executive Director Oliver
Hartwich talking to Mike Hosking here.
As Oliver puts it, “This is the
kind of Bill that requires great scrutiny because the power it confers
to the Government are enormous.” To give submitters a matter of hours
to consider the Bill is, frankly, a disgrace. It is not an
exaggeration to say that both this law and the process used to pass it
are totally inconsistent with liberal democracy.
Despite following Parliament closely,
the first we heard about the Bill was just two hours before written
submissions closed! We hastily put together a submission – which
you can read here – but it was difficult to make substantive
recommendations on this far reaching bill in such a short space of
time.
Jordan
made our views clear to the Select Committee in an oral
submission, but less than a week later Labour has rushed this
legislation through all its stages in Parliament with the extremely
disappointing support of the National Party. To their credit, ACT, the
Greens and the Māori Party all opposed this blatant power
grab.
While we all want to see the areas
affected given by the floods given the support they need – and quickly
– it is not acceptable to use this crisis to undermine parliamentary
democracy and give ministers unprecedented levels of executive power.
We only need to look at the COVID-19 slush fund where ministers spent
taxpayer dollars on projects totally unrelated to the pandemic to see
how such powers can be abused.
The Taxpayers' Union will be
monitoring decisions taken under this legislation very closely and
urge the Government – and the National Party – to allow an immediate
post-legislative review of this new law with proper public
consultation.
Lobbying review must put an end to the Beehive's revolving
door 💼💰
Following the sacking of Stuart Nash from his remaining ministerial
portfolios after it was revealed he had given confidential cabinet
information to Labour Party donors, the Prime Minister announced a
review into the lobbying sector.
In a democracy, it is important that different groups can make
representations to politicians to help shape policy, but
these activities also need to be carried out in an open and
transparent manner. The Taxpayers' Union will engage with
any consultation on how best to strike this balance.
One of the biggest problems is the revolving door between the
Beehive and the lobbying sector. Kris Faafoi, for example, was able to
lobby his former ministerial colleagues just months after leaving
Cabinet. We urgently need to see a cooling-off period introduced to
put an end to these murky practices.
But Chris Hipkins's announcement of money for a voluntary code of
conduct is not the answer. In fact, it's a complete waste of taxpayer
money (he is offering up officials to "help" the lobbying sector) and
simply a way for the government to look like it is doing
something. Taxpayers should not be footing the bill for an
unenforceable attempt to get commercial lobbyists to play by rules
they set themselves.
Time to open the books for MPs' expenses 📒💸
The Stuart Nash saga has also renewed calls for a review into
the Official Information Act (OIA). As New Zealand's
largest user of the OIA, the Taxpayers' Union agrees. A
review is long overdue, but the focus should not just be on the
Beehive: The Parliamentary Service is explicitly excluded from the
from the OIA.
This means that the public has no way of knowing what its elected
representatives are claiming taxpayer funds to cover. We know
that some are MPs are already spending taxpayer money in ways that are
potentially inappropriate but have no real way to get more information
because of this exclusion.
For a country that
considers itself to have one of the most open governments
in the world, MPs’ taxpayer-funded expenses are surprisingly opaque
compared to countries we traditionally compare ourselves
to.
The Taxpayers’ Union wants to see an end to
this transparency carve out. We would also support the introduction
of a searchable database of every MP expense claim similar to
that published by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority in
the United Kingdom.
Taxpayer Talk: Councillor Ray Chung 🎙️
This week on Taxpayer Talk, I sit down with Wellington City
Councillor, Ray Chung, to discuss Wellington’s shocking 12.3% rates
rise and why this is being driven by inefficient, wasteful spending at
the Council.
Councillor Chung was elected just last year as the representative
for Wharangi
/ Onslow-Western Ward. He's one of the few fiscal conservatives on the
Council and is able to provide some interesting insight into its inner
workings and explains why it is so hard – and expensive – to get
anything done. We also get to hear why Councillor Chung is a vocal
opponent of Three Waters and co-governance along with discussing
potential solutions for the Council's severe infrastructure
deficit.
Later in the podcast, for our War on Waste segment, Taxpayers’
Union Deputy Campaigns Manager, Connor Molloy, analyses the
growth of managers in the public service and investigates whether the
growth in the public service is driven by the core frontline workforce
or simply a ballooning of the backroom bureaucracy of managers and
consultants.
Listen to the episode | Apple | Spotify | Google Podcasts | iHeart Radio
Thank you for your support.
Yours aye,
|
Callum
Purves Campaigns Manager New Zealand
Taxpayers’ Union.
|
Media
coverage:
RNZ The Pre-Panel with Julie Woods and David
Farrar
Newstalk ZB The Huddle: Is the Chris Hipkins honeymoon already
over?
NZ Herald Political Roundup: Victory for transparency in
lobbying reforms
Newstalk ZB
Midday Edition: 04 April 2023 – Lobbying Review
(02:05)
|