From Harold Meyerson, The American Prospect <[email protected]>
Subject Meyerson on TAP: Parsing Chicago
Date April 6, 2023 7:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The Latest from the Prospect
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌


View this email in your browser
<[link removed]>

 

APRIL 6, 2023

Meyerson on TAP

Parsing Chicago

What progressives should learn, and what they shouldn't learn, from
Brandon Johnson's upset victory in the mayoral race

Today's pop quiz: In recent polling
<[link removed]>,
57 percent of Chicagoans, and 61 percent of Black Chicagoans, called the
city unsafe, and in poll after poll, voters said that the prevalence of
crime was their top issue. On Tuesday, however, Paul Vallas, who vowed
to enlarge the city's police force to crack down on crime, lost to
Brandon Johnson, who had once remarked that he backed defunding the
police, who reversed that position while campaigning, but who still said
that bettering social and economic conditions and

**not** expanding the police force was the real way to fight crime.

Explain.

For that, we need to go into Chicago's particulars. We should begin
with the actually existing Chicago police, factoring in the beliefs and
conduct of a sizable component of the force. Here, the beliefs and
conduct of the local cop union-which had endorsed Donald Trump for
president and whose leader said he supported the January 6th
insurrectionists-doubtless weighed on a number of voters who placed
crime atop their list of concerns. So did the conduct, past and present,
of a police force with a very long record of racist brutality in its
interactions with the city's Black population. In Black Chicago, which
made up more than a third of the voters in the mayoral election, the
absence of the police is to be feared in a time of rising crime, but so,
too, is the presence of police-at least, when those police are
Chicago's finest. When the local cop union went all in for Vallas,
that probably boosted the pro-Johnson vote within the Black
electorate-its 61 percent level of fear of crime notwithstanding.

Second, what happened in the third of the city's population (not,
however, its electorate) that's Latino? Vallas, like
Republican-turned-Democrat Rick Caruso in last year's mayoral contest
in Los Angeles, focused much of his campaign on winning over Latino
voters, who also listed crime as their chief concern, and had not
experienced quite the level of systemic hostility that Chicago Blacks
had in their interactions with the police.

There were, to my knowledge, no exit polls in Tuesday's Chicago
elections, but we can look at the votes
<[link removed]>
in each of the city's 50 wards. One of the major candidates in
February's mayoral primary was Democratic Rep. Jesús "Chuy" García,
who represented much of the city's heavily Latino West Side in
Congress. García didn't make it into the top-two runoff, but in
February, he did carry seven West Side wards (more precisely, winning
pluralities there in a multicandidate race). Both Vallas and Johnson
devoted considerable time and resources to those wards, and on Tuesday,
Vallas carried four of them while Johnson won the other three. Turnout
in all seven was light when set against the turnout levels in the Black
South Side and the whiter quadrants of the city.

Many other factors helped determine Tuesday's outcome, but, as Stan
Greenberg has emphasized in a number of

**Prospect** pieces, crime is the issue on which Democrats most
frequently stumble, and the role that the politics of crime played in
Johnson's victory does provide some crucial lessons for Democrats.
First, Johnson did well by emphasizing the quality of policing and crime
prevention over the quantity. He vowed to hire more detectives to deal
with the epidemic of unsolved crimes, and he vowed to increase the
socioeconomic programs that might reduce crime rates. It was crucial
that he walked back his language on defunding the police, but just as
crucial that he did not vow, as Vallas did, to simply increase the size
of a very problematic force. The split vote in the city's most Latino
wards suggests that Vallas's and Johnson's contrasting stances each
had supporters therein.

Johnson did not denigrate voters' fear of crime, nor allege that the
media hyped the crime issue, though local TV news has been doing that
virtually since its inception. He walked a tightrope on that issue, and
the split verdict among Latino voters makes clear that a portion of that
electorate doesn't think a tightrope walk answers their concerns.
Still, Johnson's positioning provides Democrats with a model for
navigating what may be their most challenging issue. You want to stop
crime? Yes, we need police, but quality matters.

~ HAROLD MEYERSON

Follow Harold Meyerson on Twitter <[link removed]>

[link removed]

Our Two-Tiered Justice System and the Trump Indictment
<[link removed]>
Corporate crime enforcement in America has been pathetic for decades.
One prosecution of a guy screaming to be prosecuted doesn't change
that. BY DAVID DAYEN

Prisoners of Their Own Device
<[link removed]>
How Congress underwrites the models that trap American policymaking BY
PHILIP ROCCO

Federal Reserve Independence Is the Problem
<[link removed]>
A weird, secretive, and unaccountable institution organizes our society,
and nobody wants to talk about it. BY MATT STOLLER

Idaho's Abortion Fixation Decimates Rural Health Care
<[link removed]>
New restrictions have fueled a physician exodus, ramped up rural health
disparities, and will invite the inevitable court challenges. BY
GABRIELLE GURLEY

[link removed]

 

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to
subscribe.  <[link removed]>

Click to Share this Newsletter

[link removed]


 

[link removed]


 

[link removed]


 

[link removed]


 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
<[link removed]>

The American Prospect, Inc.
1225 I Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC xxxxxx
United States
Copyright (c) 2023 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here
<[link removed]>.

To manage your newsletter preferences, click here
<[link removed]>.

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters,
click here
<[link removed]>.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis