Brexit:
The final chapter
|
|
 |
And We Will Always Love You
|
This week, the European Parliament had its last plenary session
with British MEPs, before they step down as a result of Brexit. Le
Monde writes about this last session, which turned out to be more
emotional than many were probably expecting, according to the article.
Two days before the deadline, the European Parliament put the British
withdrawal agreement to a final vote, which was unsurprisingly backed
by MEPs, as a formal step in the ratification process of the deal.
Following the vote, in a show of solidarity and affection for the
departing Brits, many MEPs came together in the hemicycle and to sing
“Auld Lang Syne”. The article also mentions that, although many of the
MEPS attending the plenary session reiterated their disappointment
about the outcome of Brexit, they admitted it should also serve as a
lesson to us all. It remains to be seen what kind of lesson that will
be.
|
|
 |
Has Great Britain ever been European?
|
Brexit should not be seen as an oddity, but as something rooted in
the culture and history of Great Britain, writes Il Corriere della
Sera. The article describes with dismay the cultural and
historical differences between England and the rest of Europe, by
pointing out that the British country has always been committed to
forging balance in power in the European arena, without never being
part of it. England has always cared about preserving its traditions
and conventions, including its sacred principle of sovereignty, and
keeping its special identity as unique and separated from the European
one. From Napoleon to Hitler, the reporter concludes that the national
myth has always been about Europe threatening British freedom. For
this reason, the article ends on a sour note stating that British
membership to the EU has been based on a misunderstanding: the British
interest in developing a free trade area which provides economic
benefits versus the wish of the European citizens to shape a political
union.
|
|
 |
And now what?
|
The Irish Times runs an article on the key issues that
will change after 31 January. First of all, in Brussels, the Permanent
Representation of the UK to the EU will become the ‘Mission of the UK
to the EU’, while Sir Tim Barrow, current Permanent Representative,
will have the title of Ambassador to the EU. Additionally, British
officials will lose their automatic access to EU institutions. Aside
from that, not much will immediately change. The UK remains in a
transition period until the end of 2020 and UK citizens will continue
to enjoy the same rights as they did while they were EU citizens. The
big difference, however, will be that the UK will no longer be part of
the EU’s decision-making process. The next six months are expected to
be difficult for British negotiators, the article argues, as they will
have to work fast to secure a trade deal with the EU by the end of the
transition period. If negotiations fail, border controls, tariffs and
disruptions in the trade between Ireland and Europe would become the
new reality, the article warns.
|
|
 |
Electric Shock After Brexit
|
Dnevnik discusses the possibility of higher electricity
bills in the UK post-Brexit. Currently, the UK is heavily dependent on
the EU for its electricity supply. Production has dropped by 1.6% in
2018 due to gradual closure of coal-fired plants and a giant power
grid crash in August 2019. Electricity and gas imports mainly come
from the Netherlands, France and Ireland, and represent 40% of UK’s
energy consumption. It is highly likely that the UK’s exit from the EU
and the Single Market will cause delays in the energy supply, which
can also reflect in higher electricity bills. British authorities have
announced the need alternative options to avoid any disruptions in the
electricity supply. At the moment, the UK has a carbon tax on
electricity prices to finance its energy transition which the
government might decide to drop to reduce rising bills.
|
|
|
|