SEIU's push to gut California's referendum and initiative laws

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** The Devil's Workshop
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear John,

In the devil’s workshop we call the state legislature, government union leaders are hard at work — destroying another of California’s democratic institutions.

Fresh off the shutdown of Los Angeles Unified schools ([link removed]) and the overthrow of their own elected president — and facing steep declines in membership and revenue ([link removed]) — Service Employees International Union (SEIU) activists are lobbying state lawmakers on behalf of Assembly Bill 421.

It’s the union’s bid to gut the state’s 112-year-old referendum and initiative laws. California’s government unions, perhaps especially SEIU, have been frustrated in their efforts to use that system to their own exclusive advantage. ([link removed])

Pitching AB 421 ([link removed]) as a reform, the bill’s author, Assemblyman Issac Bryan (D-Los Angeles), called the referendum and initiative laws part of “a very old process” which, “over time” have lost their “original intent and utility.”

Along with SEIU leaders, Bryan said corporations have abused the system. The referendum and initiative process “has been subverted by a small, disgruntled, well-funded, well-powered set of interests that often undermine the collective will of the people of California,” Bryan told the Los Angeles Times. ([link removed])

Here’s what’s weird about Bryan’s claim: “small,” “disgruntled,” “well-funded” and “powerful interests working against the people of California” perfectly describes the place of government unions in California politics — and describes Bryan himself.

In the last election cycle, SEIU (the group pushing AB 421) gave Bryan a jaw-dropping campaign contribution of $66,900. ([link removed])

The Los Angeles Times reports:

Assembly Bill 421 would establish new government oversight of signature collection, require more transparency about the groups funding referendum campaigns and mandate that at least 10 percent of petition signatures must be obtained by unpaid volunteers. The sweeping legislation would apply the new rules to referendums and extend to initiative campaigns that seek to repeal or amend a state statute within two years of the law taking effect.

Everyone’s for transparency — it’s how our colleague, researcher Sheridan Swanson ([link removed]) , discovered that SEIU gave the sitting California Assemblyman’s political campaign $66,900. She could do that because campaign donor disclosure laws already exist ([link removed]) , and they require transparency in molecular detail.

So, transparency isn’t a problem. The problems are the “new government oversight” and “unpaid volunteers.” Those seemingly innocuous provisions should alarm reasonable people. In California, most government oversight is of the foxes-guarding-henhouses variety ([link removed]) ; in California, “unpaid volunteers” are often government workers performing union work on the taxpayers’ dime — they call it “release time.” (You can see an example of that here ([link removed]) .)

Both Bryan and SEIU officials clearly have their talking points written in Sharpie on the palms of their hands, and the Times dutifully amplifies them, including — significantly — bullhorning the backers’ complete misrepresentation of the history of initiative, referendum and recall. Here’s how the Times reports it:

The Service Employees International Union of California and other proponents of the bill say it’s necessary to realign California’s referendum system with its founding objective from 1911: to provide a mechanism through direct democracy for voters to counter the influence corporations held over state government.

It's natural that Bryan and government union leaders would mischaracterize the intention of the initiative, referendum and recall system as anti-corporate.

The fact is that the 1911 reform campaign was indeed prompted by the corrupting influence of a corporation, the powerful Southern Pacific Railroad. The company was so massive, so pervasive that it was called “The Octopus,” and not merely because of its complex network of rail lines throughout California and the West. The company’s influence ran into every town from the Oregon border to Mexico and the Sierra Nevada. From 1865 to 1911, the Octopus ran California state and local government. The company’s capacity for personal violence and outrageous corruption are captured dramatically (sometimes too dramatically) in Frank Norris’s classic 1901 novel, “The Octopus.”

But neither “corporations” nor the Southern Pacific Railroad were mentioned in the propositions on the 1911 ballot. That’s because the principled purpose of the campaign was to create a long-term solution to the perennial problem confronting free people throughout history, the problem of special interests capturing government. The new laws would allow Californians to remind their elected officials who is ultimately in charge.

It’s worth noting that the 1911 reforms were advanced by the state's Republican governor, Hiram Johnson, as well as by local Republican Party organizations, Democrat-leaning trade unions, ranchers, farmers and business owners.

Who opposed them? People who but for their Victorian dress, awesome beards and ample bellies (not to mention their remarkable business acumen) were the 1911 versions of Issac Bryan and SEIU chairman Bill Hall — the kinds of people who, like the Southern Pacific of old, control California’s political machinery.

Recall the revelatory moment when Los Angeles teachers union boss Alex Caputo-Pearl famously said to his members, “We have a unique power — we elect our bosses. It would be difficult to think of workers anywhere else who elect their bosses. We do. We must take advantage of it.”

That’s a statement that would have impressed the owners of the Southern Pacific Railroad.

The Southern Pacific no longer exists — vanished beneath waves of mergers. But the problem of corruption persists. If anything, it is worse.

In 2023, as in 1911, it's clear that one outside interest has captured the state legislature and every statewide office — not “corporations” but government unions, the very groups behind AB 421.

No adult expects SEIU officials (or those representing any government union) to know the important history around 1911’s propositions 7 and 8 — or to be honest about that history when they find out.

Important footnote: 1911’s Prop. 4 gave women the right to vote in all California elections — nine years before the United States extended that right to all American women. Talk about being on the right side of history.
— by CPC president Will Swaim

SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])


** Lance Christensen's "Take Back California Education Tour" Continues
------------------------------------------------------------
CPC's Lance Christensen officially kicked-off his statewide education reform tour last week in San Jose, where 150 attendees participated in a "vigorous discussion" on the best opportunities for reform. Lance reports that his second stop in Huntington Beach this week left "everyone feeling energized."

Don't miss Lance's townhalls in April! Upcoming dates include:
* Sacramento — April 3rd, 6:30-8:30pm
* Palm Desert — April 10th, 11:00am-1:00pm
* Copperopolis — April 15th, 2:00-4:00pm
* Glendora — April 27th, 6:30-8:30pm

You can register for each of these events and sign up for updates on additional locations here ([link removed]) .
New Podcasts ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #269: The Aztec Identity
------------------------------------------------------------
CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen spend far too much time discussing the San Diego State University Aztecs’ rampage through March Madness — and what about that name?! In other news: the meaning of Nashville, and why government unions are so eager to gut California’s 112-year-old initiative process. Listen now. ([link removed])

[link removed]


** California Underground Podcast: Convo with Lance Christensen about the State of Education in California
------------------------------------------------------------
Lance Christensen, CPC's Vice President of Education Policy and Government Affairs, joins this week's California Underground Podcast to talk about the power of the teachers unions and how California needs to break free from their grip to enact real change. Listen now. ([link removed])

More from CPC ()


** Capistrano Unified: A Case Study in Opposing Bad Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------
Too often, school districts put bond measures on the ballot that sound good on paper but lack accountability, leaving voters with higher taxes for decades with little to show for it. CPC research associate Sheridan Swanson examines how voters in Capistrano Unified fought ill-conceived bond measures and won. Read the article. ([link removed])


Fact-Checking Randi Weingarten

American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten penned an opinion piece earlier this month in which she claims to make “a factual case” for all the good that teachers’ unions do for children. Not surprisingly, she makes a bunch of easily refutable and outright ridiculous claims. Larry Sand, president of the California Teachers Empowerment Network, explains in this week's article. ([link removed])



** Quote of the Week
------------------------------------------------------------
"If it isn’t delusion that impels our ruling class to dismantle and destroy conventional energy infrastructure with nothing remotely capable of replacing it, then it is corruption on a scale rarely seen in the history of the world, and a stupefying indifference to the consequences of that corruption." — CPC senior fellow Edward Ring in the California Globe ([link removed]) on the fantasy of achieving “net zero”

SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]